1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2732-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bell Inequalities with Postselection

Abstract: Experimental tests of Bell inequalities ought to take into account all detection events. If the latter are postselected, and only some of these events are included in the statistical analysis, a Bell inequality may be violated, even by purely classical correlations. The paradoxical properties of Werner states, recently pointed out by Popescu, can be explained as the result of a postselection of the detection events, or, equivalently, as due to the preparation of a new state by means of a nonlocal process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, the term "postselection" has various meanings. It quite often refers to a method of selectively choose specific outcomes after many rounds of quantum measurements [23,24]. The postselection that we discuss here was introduced by Aaronson as "the power of discarding all runs of a computation in which a given event does not occur" [4].…”
Section: Comparison Between Lqc and Quantum Computing With Postselectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we know, the term "postselection" has various meanings. It quite often refers to a method of selectively choose specific outcomes after many rounds of quantum measurements [23,24]. The postselection that we discuss here was introduced by Aaronson as "the power of discarding all runs of a computation in which a given event does not occur" [4].…”
Section: Comparison Between Lqc and Quantum Computing With Postselectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important feature of this scheme is that it allows Alice and Bob to perform a Bell test on the whole ensemble of the prepared states without sampling them. This, combined with the use of photodetectors of high efficiency closes the detection loophole and paves the way to performing a genuine loophole-free Bell test [26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%