Benchmarking and pondering ASERL interlibrary loan operations, 2010 and 2013

Abstract

Purpose – In 2010 and 2013, the libraries in the Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL) were surveyed to identify benchmarks and programs to support resource sharing. Benchmarks and challenges identified generate discussions regarding programming, networking, and other support to improve resource sharing operations. This paper seeks to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This study compares and contrasts the two surveys using mixed methods data analysis. This study assesses ILL performance and explores the challenges and trends interlibrary loan practitioners see today. Findings – The article identifies changes and trends in consortia-wide transaction volumes; staffing levels; campus document delivery; professional issues and challenges; and library organizational schemes. Research limitations/implications – The study did not include data from constituencies outside of interlibrary loan. It also did not include interview follow-ups with survey participants to discuss challenges and reorganizations in greater detail. Future interlibrary loan research could focus less on operational metrics and more on broader issues such as e-resources and change management. Mixed methods are effect tools for benchmarking and comparative case studies. Practical implications – Individual libraries can compare themselves to the operational benchmarks and use insights drawn from comment analysis to stimulate conversations regarding current and future roles for interlibrary loan. Consortia can duplicate the study to understand their operational benchmarks and their particular contexts. Originality/value – The study provides comparative benchmarks for research libraries and consortia spanning three years. It demonstrates substantial shifts in issues faced by libraries and librarians.

Impact of COVID-19 and Renewed Awareness of Where We Could Improve

“…Kappus combined data analysis and trend analysis to explain increased borrowing request rates at Gonzaga University (Kappus, 2009). Atkins, et al reported a slight 2% decrease in the average number of total requests between 2010 and 2013 among the Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (Atkins et al, 2014). Through interviews with "thought leaders in resource sharing, " Birch, et al recorded that some institutions were experiencing increases in requests while others experienced decreases (Birch et al, 2013).…”

Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature: No 88

“…Nearly all respondents continued to provide a campus document delivery service from their own collections, and ArticleExchange experienced a very rapid take up. More such surveys would be very useful (Atkins et al, 2014). A well conducted survey of four major academic Omani libraries found much support for collaboration but identified a number of challenges "such as:…”

CARL Libraries – a Canadian resource-sharing experience

“…This study aims to map the current resource sharing environment in Canada through the lens of its research libraries in general and the University of Alberta (UA) in particular. Prompted by Mak's (2011) study of resource sharing patterns and trends in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) in the USA during the past 35 years (Mak, 2011), along with more recent benchmarking data from the Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (Atkins et al, 2014), the authors were interested in looking at transactional ILL data from Canada. Connected by more than just a border, did Canadian academic libraries see the same exponential growth in ILL as its neighbour to the south?…”