Benchmarking Scholarly Performance by Faculty in Forestry and Forest Products

Sundaram, Mekala; Kellner, Kenneth F.; Fei, Songlin

doi:10.1093/jofore/fvx021

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dealing with larger samples, future research could consider selecting only comparable men who graduated the same year. Indeed, while the evolution of the cumulative advantage is limited over a period of one year (Curran et al 2020), it still exists (Swihart et al 2018). Despite the limitations, this study shows that the pair-matched technique is proven to be an effective method for disparity analysis between the member of a potentially discriminated group and pair matched comparable members of a category of reference.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools

Halilem

Silva

Amara

2022

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…One can hypothesise that in such a short period of time, the accumulated advantage is limited, allowing the comparison(Curran et al 2020). For example, regarding research, an average increase of the h-index per year is of only 0.6(Swihart et al 2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools

Halilem

Silva

Amara

2022

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The increasing pressure to publish stems from a combination of the faculty member's need to publish for tenure, promotion, and other career advancements and the graduate student's need to have a record of publications when seeking employment. Models of future academic productivity among natural resources faculty members identify publishing early in one's academic pathway as one of the best predictors of longer‐term success (Swihart, Sundaram, Hoeoek, & Dewoody, 2016; Swihart, Sundaram, Kellner, & Fei, 2018). Universities are rewarded when they succeed in raising the research status of their institution, and one common metric for determining the research ranking is the annual number of publications per faculty member (Chou & Chan, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are a number of academics who have addressed whether the increased pressure to publish results in questionable research practices and/or contributes to the ballooning of authorship lists on publications (Edwards & Roy, 2017; Villar, 2019). Use of benchmarked metrics to account for time in academia, gender, research appointment, and subdisciplinary focus (Swihart et al., 2018) may provide university administrators with a better system for the evaluation of faculty members and graduate students.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rising expectations: Natural resources graduate student authorship of publications

Copenheaver

2020

Natural Sciences Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Publication patterns of natural resources graduate students from nine U.S. universities were compared across seven decades in an effort to assist graduate students and faculty members in setting realistic expectations for publication. Graduate students steadily increased their level of publication in peer‐reviewed journals across the study period. In the 1950s, 0% of doctoral students published their research and by the 2000s, 73% of doctoral students published their research. There was also an increasing temporal trend in the number of co‐authors on graduate student publications. In the 1960s, 50% of graduate student publications had two co‐authors and in the 2000s, 28% of graduate‐student publications had two authors; 29% had three authors; 21% had four authors; 13% had five authors; and 10% had six or more authors. Publications authored by doctoral students received significantly more citations (average of 23.2 citations per publication) than those publications authored by master's students (average of 17.1 citations per publication). As expectations for graduate student publication and ability to work on larger research teams rise, it is important that universities and faculty advisors provide resources and training to allow graduate students to successfully reach these new expectations.

show abstract

“…The opinions of the clinicians were collected and they engaged in the study to support the practical validity of the study (S. Vinodh & Aravindraj, 2015). Benchmarking offers a much-needed framework for understanding objective success indicators and should support a systematic peer analysis (Swihart et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review of Benchmarking Implementation in various Industries

Purmala

Debora²

2021

IJIEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to explore benchmarking in various industries beyond Indonesia to find the gap between each industry and what makes it different from Indonesia. Benchmarking is recognized as an essential instrument for continuous quality enhancement. In this paper, the author has reviewed 60 articles distributed from 2015 to 2020 in a variety of journal research and journal review. Systematic literature reviews are the approaches used in this study since a precise, consistent, and clear methodology, with a variety of steps, guarantees sufficient rigor and clarity in the literature review process. Authors have a review in multi-perspective to help researchers, academics, and practitioners more deeply understand and take a closer look at the growth, development, and applicability of this technique. Authors have classification the various paper-based on goals and scope of achievement from benchmarking applicable. In Addition, this paper also needs to find a better solution from each gap of benchmarking in the pandemic situation with the industry 4.0 approach

show abstract

Benchmarking Scholarly Performance by Faculty in Forestry and Forest Products

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools

Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools

Rising expectations: Natural resources graduate student authorship of publications

A Systematic Literature Review of Benchmarking Implementation in various Industries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About