1936
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1936.04140010070006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta Hemolytic Streptococcic Infection in Infancy and in Childhood

Abstract: In previous investigations 1 it was observed that the antistreptolysin titer of infants at the onset of infections was lower than that of older persons and that their antistreptolysin response to infection with beta hemolytic streptococci was minimal. Furthermore, Wilson, Wheeler and Leask 2 observed that the average antistreptolysin titer of a group of new-born infants (56 units)3 was approximately that of their mothers (50 units). Repeated determinations showed that the mothers' titers remained at a constant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1936
1936
1958
1958

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic feature is the very low titer of the serum obtained in several patients. This is frequently comparable to the low titers obtained by Lippard and Johnson (6) in infants under 18 months of age. All of these patients with very low titers were edematous.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristic feature is the very low titer of the serum obtained in several patients. This is frequently comparable to the low titers obtained by Lippard and Johnson (6) in infants under 18 months of age. All of these patients with very low titers were edematous.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Titers between 7 and 10 units were obtained on one or several occasions with the blood serum from 4 of these patients (4,5,6,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of cases (about 75 per cent) the titer in our series lay between 25 and 50 units. The determination of the lower limit of the antistreptolysin in the normal adult is also important, for Lippard and Johnson (9) found this to be unusually low in infants under 17 months of age. In 55 per cent of these patients the titer was only 2 units.…”
Section: Sum Marymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clot resistance has also been observed in individuals where no evidence of streptococcal infection could be recognized. Positive antifibrinolysin tests, for example, have been reported in the following instances: 15 per cent of normal individuals (3,4); in a number of unrelated disease states, as lobar pneumonia, gonococcal arthritis, typhoid fever, and acute nephritis (5 to 7); in the newborn (8,6); and in various animal species (9,1). These findings, in turn, have placed some doubt on the specificity of the antifibrinolysin response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibrinolysin-antifibrinolysin reaction Although the antifibrinolysin test has been found occasionally to be non-specific, it is generally accepted that the clot resistance developed in in-3 "Hemostatic Globulin," Lederle Laboratories, Inc. dividuals convalescent from streptococcal disease is a specific immunological response to the infection (2). While it has not been possible to elicit antifibrinolysin by animal inoculation (20), the immunological nature of the antifibrinolytic response in man is supported by the observation that the development of fibrinolytic resistance is correlated with the formation of other streptococcal antibodies, such as antistreptolysin "O" (21,22,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%