2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
275
2
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
275
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings on the challenges in KPIs implementation were identified and it showed that the current KPIs are lacking in fulfilling the criteria of a good indicator. These identified challenges are parallel with the previous studies by David & Steve (2012); Lawther & Martin (2014); Javed et al (2013b); Toor & Ogunlana (2010), which indicated that KPIs is lack of clarity, difficult to understand, too complicated and some KPIs are too general. These factors will lead to the failure and poor projects performance.…”
Section: Challenges Of Kpis In Pfi Projectssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings on the challenges in KPIs implementation were identified and it showed that the current KPIs are lacking in fulfilling the criteria of a good indicator. These identified challenges are parallel with the previous studies by David & Steve (2012); Lawther & Martin (2014); Javed et al (2013b); Toor & Ogunlana (2010), which indicated that KPIs is lack of clarity, difficult to understand, too complicated and some KPIs are too general. These factors will lead to the failure and poor projects performance.…”
Section: Challenges Of Kpis In Pfi Projectssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For instance; lack of clarity and understanding of KPIs for PFI projects (Lawther & Martin, 2014;Javed et al, 2013a;David & Steve, 2012) and insufficient effective performance indicators for measuring quality of the service delivery (Toor & Ogunlana, 2010;Oyedele, 2013;Javed et al, 2013b). The agreeing level of performance can determine the amount of payments or deductions from the public sector to the private sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest that they are easy, timely and the most common combination of criteria that have long been used to measure project success (Anda & Sjøberg, 2009;Savolainen et al, 2012;Kaur & Sengupta, 2011). Although completion of project within agreed time, budget and meeting the required functionality does not guarantee success of a project (Nixon et al, 2012;PMI, 2013;Westerveld, 2003;Toor & Ogunlana, 2010;Wateridge, 1998), failure in…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional measures or the so-called iron triangle of time, cost, and quality has been the dominating performance indicator in construction projects [14]. The project is considered an overall success if the project meets the technical performance specifications and/or missions to be performed, and if there is a high level of satisfaction is present [15].…”
Section: Viability Of Privatised Highway Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%