Bibliometric Structured Review of Mobile Information Systems

Abstract

This study attempts to fill the identified research gap in the existing literature through a bibliometric analysis and discovered 20 highly global citedpapers with 1376 citations and yielded eight (8) core categories of knowledge in MobIS: (1) Information Systems, (2) Adoption, (3) Acceptance, (4) Satisfaction, (5) Information Systems Success and (6) Information Systems continuance. The results show that the distribution of the annual papers flows along the downslope. It was a bit stable in 2016 and since then descend from 2017 to 2020. As a young discipline, there is a need for more productivity, impact, and collaboration in the field of MobIS.

The composition of data economy: a bibliometric approach and TCCM framework of conceptual, intellectual and social structure

“…This section begins by examining how data economy has been conceptualized from the perspective of theories through the lens of TCCM framework. The TCCM has recently gained momentum in systematic reviews and bibliometric analysis studies (Sharma et al , 2020; Olaleye et al , 2021). In this framework, scholars posit that the popularity of the TCCM is hinged on the ease with which knowledge gaps can be spotted and a logical process of recommending future research direction (Singh et al , 2020).…”

Bibliometric Viewpoints of Wired Campus Through Higher Institution Blogging

“…Bibliometrics research helps scholars explore trends in a field of study and provide evidence for the impact of the research. Further, it is an excellent channel to find new and emerging themes and areas of research and identifies research collaborators and suitable sources to publish (Olaleye, Sanusi & Dada, 2021).…”