2020
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional longitudinal relationship between Chinese children's compounding awareness and vocabulary knowledge from Grades 3 to 6

Abstract: Background: This study examined the developmental relationship between Chinese children's compounding awareness and vocabulary knowledge following a 4-year longitudinal design. Methods: A test battery that included measures of vocabulary knowledge, compounding awareness, nonverbal IQ, phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, orthographic awareness and word reading was administered to 142 Chinese-speaking students in Grade 3 (T1). In addition, vocabulary knowledge and compounding awareness were followe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive-linguistic skills and vocabulary depth in L1 Chinese and L2 English Vocabulary knowledge depth, as measured with tasks of oral definition, was significantly correlated with other cognitive-linguistic skills in Chinese and English in previous studies (e.g., Choi et al, 2019;McBride-Chang et al, 2005aPan et al, 2011;Tong et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2020). Vocabulary knowledge depth involves using various linguistic structures to express accurate information, represent the core meanings of linguistic items, and thus explain or define words (Benelli et al, 2006).…”
Section: Cognitive-linguistic Skills and Receptive Vocabulary Breadth...mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cognitive-linguistic skills and vocabulary depth in L1 Chinese and L2 English Vocabulary knowledge depth, as measured with tasks of oral definition, was significantly correlated with other cognitive-linguistic skills in Chinese and English in previous studies (e.g., Choi et al, 2019;McBride-Chang et al, 2005aPan et al, 2011;Tong et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2020). Vocabulary knowledge depth involves using various linguistic structures to express accurate information, represent the core meanings of linguistic items, and thus explain or define words (Benelli et al, 2006).…”
Section: Cognitive-linguistic Skills and Receptive Vocabulary Breadth...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Phonological awareness has been shown to be associated with vocabulary knowledge depth in several previous studies on Chinese children's L1 Chinese and their L2 English (e.g., Choi et al, 2019;McBride-Chang et al, 2008;Pan et al, 2011;Song et al, 2015). In addition, the importance of morphemes for vocabulary learning has been highlighted in previous work in both Chinese (McBride-Chang et al, 2008;Xie et al, 2020) and English (Nagy & Anderson, 1984;Sparks & Deacon, 2015). Morphological awareness was uniquely associated with vocabulary knowledge depth in Hong Kong children's L1 Chinese and L2 English (e.g., Tong et al, 2017Tong et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Cognitive-linguistic Skills and Receptive Vocabulary Breadth...mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compound production task (Liu & McBride‐Chang, 2010) consisted of 8 practice items and 20 test items. This task has been widely used to assess compounding awareness in Chinese middle‐ and upper‐grades (Liu & Liu, 2020; Xie et al, 2020). In this task, questions/scenarios were presented to children orally, and they were asked to produce new words based on the key information contained in the question/scenario.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vocabulary definition task (Song et al, 2015) consisted of one practice item and 32 test items arranged in increasing difficulty, and was used to evaluate children's vocabulary knowledge. This task was administered in grades 3, 4, and 5, and has been chosen to assess vocabulary knowledge of Chinese middle‐ and upper‐graders in previous studies (Song et al, 2015; Xie et al, 2020). The experimenter verbally presented the vocabulary, and then the children were asked to explain the meaning of the vocabulary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%