2021
DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v23.i3.pp1611-1619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big transfer learning for automated skin cancer classification

Abstract: <p>Skin cancer is an example of the most dangerous disease. Early diagnosis of skin cancer can save many people’s lives. Manual classification methods are time-consuming and costly. Deep learning has been proposed for the automated classification of skin cancer. Although deep learning showed impressive performance in several medical imaging tasks, it requires a big number of images to achieve a good performance. The skin cancer classification task suffers from providing deep learning with sufficient data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 8 shows that the proposed approach ranked second after L. Alzubaidi et al (2021) [ 10 ], where they obtained an accuracy of 98.57%, a precision of 99.18%, a recall of 97.90%, and an F1 score of 98.53%. Z. M. Arkah (2021) [ 18 ] ranked third with an accuracy of 93.7%, a precision of 95.7%, a recall of 94.6%, and an F1-score of 95.1%. V. Shah et al (2020) [ 15 ] came in fourth, with an accuracy of 93.96%, a precision of 94.11%, a recall of 93.96%, an F1-score of 93.24%, a sensitivity of 99.7%, and a specificity of 55.67%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 8 shows that the proposed approach ranked second after L. Alzubaidi et al (2021) [ 10 ], where they obtained an accuracy of 98.57%, a precision of 99.18%, a recall of 97.90%, and an F1 score of 98.53%. Z. M. Arkah (2021) [ 18 ] ranked third with an accuracy of 93.7%, a precision of 95.7%, a recall of 94.6%, and an F1-score of 95.1%. V. Shah et al (2020) [ 15 ] came in fourth, with an accuracy of 93.96%, a precision of 94.11%, a recall of 93.96%, an F1-score of 93.24%, a sensitivity of 99.7%, and a specificity of 55.67%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His model suffered from an overfitting problem. Z. M. Arkah et al, 2021 [ 18 ], proposed a new approach to transfer learning by training the models (VGG, GoogleNet, ResNet50) from scratch on a large number of unlabeled melanoma images, and then training them on a small number of labeled skin images. They applied their approach to the ISIC 2020 dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…− True negative (TN) is a negative object class and negative image position prediction. Furthermore, the following metrics are calculated using the confusion matrix terminology below [4], [34].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, DNNs are state-of-the-art image analysis tools that perform exceptionally well in image classification tasks [8]. DNNs, which consist of multiple layers of interconnected artificial neurons, are adept at deriving intricate image features and making accurate predictions [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%