1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02428.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of Meat Pieces: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Restructured Steakettes Containing Added Myosin and/or Sarcoplasmic Protein

Abstract: Suspensions of crude myosin, sarcoplasmic protein and a mixture of both were prepared. Each was mixed with coarsely-ground meat in the ratio 1:lO w/w. The product was formed into frozen rolls, 6.5 cm diameter, from which steakettes 2 cm thick were cut. These were oven broiled to an internal temperature of 70°C and assessed by a laboratory taste panel. The binding strength between meat pieces was also objectively assessed. Overall, taste panel members preferred the products containing added myosin with salt to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding junctions that would develop between meat pieces in sectioned and formed products were shown to be strongest when formed with myosin (Macfarlane et al, 1977;Ford et al, 1978;Siegel and Schmidt, 1979a, b;Turner et al, 1979). Strength of protein gels is a criterion that is frequently used to evaluate food proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Binding junctions that would develop between meat pieces in sectioned and formed products were shown to be strongest when formed with myosin (Macfarlane et al, 1977;Ford et al, 1978;Siegel and Schmidt, 1979a, b;Turner et al, 1979). Strength of protein gels is a criterion that is frequently used to evaluate food proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A wide range of sensory tests-ranking, category and profile techniques-have been used to assess the tactile, appearance, texture, flavor, juiciness and hedonic (liking) attributes of restructured meats (Ford et al, 1978;Cardello et al, 1983).…”
Section: Sensory Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Control, without reducing agent treatment; A, treated with 0.1% cysteine; B, treated with 0.1% NaHSO 3 ; C, treated with 0.1% of the mixture of cysteine and NaHSO 3 . 3 Values in the same column bearing different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). The reactive SH was expressed as moles of SH per 5 ¥ 10 5 g protein.…”
Section: Effect Of Reducing Agents On the Reactive And Total Sulfhydrmentioning
confidence: 96%