2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-based films with high antioxidant and improved water-resistant properties from cellulose nanofibres and lignin nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was due to the introduced aldehyde groups reducing the number of hydroxyl groups that could interact with water molecules. This result is in agreement with earlier reports that found hydrophobicity increased when the aldehyde group was introduced [47].…”
Section: Swelling Capacity and Hydrophobicity Of Filmssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This was due to the introduced aldehyde groups reducing the number of hydroxyl groups that could interact with water molecules. This result is in agreement with earlier reports that found hydrophobicity increased when the aldehyde group was introduced [47].…”
Section: Swelling Capacity and Hydrophobicity Of Filmssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The reason was that the hydrogen bonds between cellulose molecules were sensitive to water and were broken by water molecules, leading to a decrease in tensile strength. 55 LRCF and LDCF exhibited better levels of wet tensile strength of 31.0 and 33.3 MPa, respectively, which were numerically very close (no significant difference). However, their depletion in water was 61.4 and 63.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Of Water Resistancementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The wet tensile strength of CPS also dramatically decreased to 1.8 MPa even with the hydrophobic coating applied. The reason was that the hydrogen bonds between cellulose molecules were sensitive to water and were broken by water molecules, leading to a decrease in tensile strength . LRCF and LDCF exhibited better levels of wet tensile strength of 31.0 and 33.3 MPa, respectively, which were numerically very close (no significant difference).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%