Bioadhesion of Biomaterials

Sunarintyas, Siti

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14845-8_5

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research shows that, considering these aspects, medical practitioners will likely try their best to control the medical devices through bioadhesion processes by enhancing the desirable interaction of bioadhesion and eliminating the adverse interactions. Therefore, to comprehend the debate on the bioadhesion of biomaterials in order to redefine healthcare management, it is necessary to mention some methods of the bioadhesion testing, which includes the evaluation of (a) surface roughness/surface morphology/surface topography, (b) chemical interactions, (c) physiological factors, (d) physical and mechanical effects, and (e) the contact angle and testing of biofilm formation [ 7 , 8 ]. In this conceptual article, focus has been placed on natural polymer-based bioadhesive biomaterials, i.e., polysaccharide/carbohydrate-based adhesives and protein-based adhesives.…”

Section: Bioadhesion Of Biomaterialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…“Bioadhesion of Biomaterials” covers the bioadhesion aspect of biomaterials as healthcare challenges via the research and development of effective and low-cost materials. However, their application as medical devices is limited given the degradation [ 7 ].…”

Section: Implementation Of Bioadhesive Biomaterials In Healthcarementioning

confidence: 99%

“… Bioadhesion of biomaterials (based on the idea from the Bioadhesion of Biomaterials , and Medical Devices, Springer Book [ 7 ]). …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Polymer Based Bioadhesive Biomaterials for Medical Application—A Perspective of Redefining Healthcare System Management

Saha

Sáha

et al. 2020

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article deliberates about the importance of polymer-based bioadhesive biomaterials’ medical application in healthcare and in redefining healthcare management. Nowadays, the application of bioadhesion in the health sector is one of the great interests for various researchers, due to recent advances in their formulation development. Actually, this area of study is considered as an active multidisciplinary research approach, where engineers, scientists (including chemists, physicists, biologists, and medical experts), material producers and manufacturers combine their knowledge in order to provide better healthcare. Moreover, while discussing the implications of value-based healthcare, it is necessary to mention that health comprises three main domains, namely, physical, mental, and social health, which not only prioritize the quality healthcare, but also enable us to measure the outcomes of medical interventions. In addition, this conceptual article provides an understanding of the consequences of the natural or synthetic polymer-based bioadhesion of biomaterials, and its significance for redefining healthcare management as a novel approach. Furthermore, the research assumptions highlight that the quality healthcare concept has recently become a burning topic, wherein healthcare service providers, private research institutes, government authorities, public service boards, associations and academics have taken the initiative to restructure the healthcare system to create value for patients and increase their satisfaction, and lead ultimately to a healthier society.

show abstract

Section: Bioadhesion Of Biomaterialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Implementation Of Bioadhesive Biomaterials In Healthcarementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Polymer Based Bioadhesive Biomaterials for Medical Application—A Perspective of Redefining Healthcare System Management

Saha

Sáha

et al. 2020

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 To overcome this situation physicians, use a higher concentration of drugs leading to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). [5][6][7][8] The metabolic rate inside and the surface of biofilm is different, coming to deeper metabolic rate is low compared to the surface. This gives a prolonged exposure to antibiotics less than a lethal dose to the inner side of biofilm-producing bacteria.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthetic Biology’s Latest Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm

Aboobacker¹,

Ragunathan²,

Sanjeevi³

et al. 2023

J. Pure Appl. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent instances of novel biological circuits that enable cells to gain biosynthetic skills demonstrate synthetic biology’s therapeutic potential. Synthetic biology is a branch of biology whose primary role is to build completely functional biological systems from the smallest basic elements such as DNA, proteins, and other organic molecules to complex bacteria. This review briefly mentions some novel way of synthetic strategies like bacterial modelling, two-component systems, synthetic peptide, and synthetic flavonoids used for targeting biofilm and drug-stable microbial communities. Bacterial modelling was mainly done in Escherichia coli and Mycoplasma using different strategies like introducing quorum sensing devices and CRISPR-mediated editing. Synthetic peptides are also one of the extensively studied ongoing areas which are produced from natural peptides taking as a template and altering amino acid position. Flavonoids are produced by two-step reaction and molecular hybridization methods. This kind of synthetic approach reported significant biofilm dispersion and lethal effects on clinically relevant bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Streptococcus species and Klebsiella pneumonia.

show abstract

“…Also, while biofilms can help degrade pollutants in liquid and gaseous effluents in wastewater treatment plants, undesired biofilm formation in drinking water, oil pipelines, and ship hulls can lead to biofouling and biocorrosion, which undermine operation safety and loss of productivity (Muhammad et al 2020 ). Furthermore, biofilms are typically associated with clinical chronic, nosocomial, and medical device-related infections (Khatoon et al 2018 ; Stoodley et al 2013 ; Sunarintyas 2016 ; Vickery et al 2011 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An adaptable microreactor to investigate the influence of interfaces on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth

Silva

Traini

et al. 2022

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biofilms are ubiquitous and notoriously difficult to eradicate and control, complicating human infections and industrial and agricultural biofouling. However, most of the study had used the biofilm model that attached to solid surface and developed in liquid submerged environments which generally have neglected the impact of interfaces. In our study, a reusable dual-chamber microreactor with interchangeable porous membranes was developed to establish multiple growth interfaces for biofilm culture and test. Protocol for culturing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1) on the air–liquid interface (ALI) and liquid–liquid interface (LLI) under static environmental conditions for 48 h was optimized using this novel device. This study shows that LLI model biofilms are more susceptible to physical disruption compared to ALI model biofilm. SEM images revealed a unique “dome-shaped” microcolonies morphological feature, which is more distinct on ALI biofilms than LLI. Furthermore, the study showed that ALI and LLI biofilms produced a similar amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). As differences in biofilm structure and properties may lead to different outcomes when using the same eradication approaches, the antimicrobial effect of an antibiotic, ciprofloxacin (CIP), was chosen to test the susceptibility of a 48-h-old P. aeruginosa biofilms grown on ALI and LLI. Our results show that the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of 6-h CIP exposure for ALI and LLI biofilms is significantly different, which are 400 μg/mL and 200 μg/mL, respectively. These results highlight the importance of growth interface when developing more targeted biofilm management strategies, and our novel device provides a promising tool that enables manipulation of realistic biofilm growth. Key points • A novel dual-chamber microreactor device that enables the establishment of different interfaces for biofilm culture has been developed. • ALI model biofilms and LLI model biofilms show differences in resistance to physical disruption and antibiotic susceptibility.

show abstract

Bioadhesion of Biomaterials

Cited by 4 publications

References 76 publications

Polymer Based Bioadhesive Biomaterials for Medical Application—A Perspective of Redefining Healthcare System Management

Polymer Based Bioadhesive Biomaterials for Medical Application—A Perspective of Redefining Healthcare System Management

Synthetic Biology’s Latest Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm

An adaptable microreactor to investigate the influence of interfaces on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About