1991
DOI: 10.3109/03639049109040824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioadhesive Polymers - Synthesis, Evaluation and Application in Controlled Release Tablets

Abstract: Synthesis of series of cross linked polymers of methacrylic acid (PMAs) and acrylic acid ( P U S ) is reported. Polymers of both the types have been investigated f o r physiochemical properties like solubility, density, swelling index and equilibrium swelling. A suitable method was devised for study of bioadhesion. Floating tablets were prepared and coated with some of the synthesized polymers. The tablets were then evaluated for physical properties (including bioadhesion) as well as for drug content and in v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chitnis et al (1991) synthesized a series of bioadhesive polymers that were cross-linked polymers of PMA and CP. Floating tablets of isosorbide mononitrate were prepared and then coated with these polymers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chitnis et al (1991) synthesized a series of bioadhesive polymers that were cross-linked polymers of PMA and CP. Floating tablets of isosorbide mononitrate were prepared and then coated with these polymers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the stomach empties and the tablet is at the pylorus, the buoyancy of the dosage form may be impeded (Chueh, Zia, and Rhodes 1995). This serious limitation can be overcome by using bioadhesive polymers to enable it to adhere to the mucous lining of the stomach wall (Chitnis, Malshe, and Lalla 1991). Floating and bioadhesive drug delivery systems offer the advantages of increased contact time with stomach mucusa, more effective absorption and bioavailability of drugs with absorption windows near proximal intestine and stomach, and low dosing frequencies (Lehr CM et al 1992;Chueh et al1995 andRao et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the main drawback of FDDS is that it is effective only when the fluid level in the stomach is sufficiently high, which aids in the buoyancy of the dosage form [13]. This limitation can be overcome by using bioadhesive polymers which enable it to adhere to the mucous lining of the stomach wall [14]. Floating-bioadhesive drug delivery systems offer the advantages of increased contact time with stomach mucosa resulting in more effective absorption, improving the bioavailability of drugs with absorption window high in the stomach and proximal intestine and reduced dosing frequencies [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches including floating systems, bioadhesive systems, swelling and expanding systems and high density systems have been successfully employed to improve the gastric residence time of a delivery system [4,5]. Though highly efficient for gastroretention, floating systems suffer from a major disadvantage that they are effective only when the fluid level in the stomach is sufficiently high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%