2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02388.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility and bone formation with porous modified PMMA in normal and irradiated mandibular tissue

Abstract: Both modified PMMA cements have good biocompatibility, bioactivity and support bone ingrowth and additional post-operative radiation did not show any negative effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…New nanostructured polymer membranes based on polymethylmethacrylate are proposed. Polymethylmethacrylates (PMMA) are non-reabsorbable but biocompatible polymers, which have been widely used to clinically fix prostheses to bone or for vertebroplasty, intraocular lenses, orthopaedic bone cements, skull defects reparation or mandibular reconstruction between others, due to its excellent tissue compatibility [6,7]. Presented polymeric solution may be spun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New nanostructured polymer membranes based on polymethylmethacrylate are proposed. Polymethylmethacrylates (PMMA) are non-reabsorbable but biocompatible polymers, which have been widely used to clinically fix prostheses to bone or for vertebroplasty, intraocular lenses, orthopaedic bone cements, skull defects reparation or mandibular reconstruction between others, due to its excellent tissue compatibility [6,7]. Presented polymeric solution may be spun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many of these applications, such as mandibular reconstruction or intraocular lenses, a good cell–biomaterial interaction is paramount for the integration of the implant, and the stability of the fixation on the interface or the prevention of cataract, respectively. However, PMMA shows weak or null interactivity against tissue cells, which promotes the formation of fibrotic tissue [ 10 , 11 ]. The formation of fibrotic tissue around the implant is known to be one of the most common causes of implant integration failure, which compromises its long-term viability [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation of an apatite or hydroxyapatite layer on the surface in SBF is considered an indication of bone adhesion potential. However, making the PMMA surface porous is an alternative route to provide good bone tissue adhesion . We have tested the samples for surface changes by soaking them in SBF for 20 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%