2020
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.138.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility Evaluation of New TiMoSi Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When performing the tests necessary to assess the interactions from the biomaterial–tissue interface, the objective and subjective factors that may influence the response of the tissue, but also those of the biomaterial, are considered in order to correctly interpret the results, depending on the material factors and specifically those related to the surface [ 3 , 5 , 6 ]. The important parameters for the direct tissue–biomaterial contact [ 7 , 8 ] are the biocompatibility of the material chosen for the implant, the macrostructure (shape), the microstructure (surface roughness, geometry of the elevations, and depressions in the implant), the surgical implant procedure, the direct tissue–implant contact after insertion (implantation), and the time and manner of loading the implant, which may result in movements of the implant relative to the adjacent tissue and the implant support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When performing the tests necessary to assess the interactions from the biomaterial–tissue interface, the objective and subjective factors that may influence the response of the tissue, but also those of the biomaterial, are considered in order to correctly interpret the results, depending on the material factors and specifically those related to the surface [ 3 , 5 , 6 ]. The important parameters for the direct tissue–biomaterial contact [ 7 , 8 ] are the biocompatibility of the material chosen for the implant, the macrostructure (shape), the microstructure (surface roughness, geometry of the elevations, and depressions in the implant), the surgical implant procedure, the direct tissue–implant contact after insertion (implantation), and the time and manner of loading the implant, which may result in movements of the implant relative to the adjacent tissue and the implant support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers have performed biocompatibility studies [ 6 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] on Ti-Mo and C.P. Ti, indicating that these alloys are not highly toxic and are biocompatible with human tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ti and its alloys are widely used in orthopedic and orthodontic implants [31] but exhibit a lack of antibacterial effectiveness activities and implant-associated rejection issues occur in the case of long-term uses. Furthermore, the biocompatibility, both at the micro-and nanoscales of Ti alloys-based implants, depend strongly on their composition and surface roughness [32,33] that can be improved by either a physical or chemical surface modification process. To this aim, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) have proven to be an efficient approach to coherently improve metallic surface properties including those of Ti.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ti and its alloys are widely used in orthopedic and orthodontic implants [31] but exhibit a lack of antibacterial effectiveness activities and implants-associated rejection issues occur in the case of long term uses. Furthermore, the biocompatibility both, at the micro-and nanoscales of Ti alloys-based implants depend strongly on their composition and surface roughness [32,33] that can be improved by either a physical or chemical surface modification process. To this aim, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) have proven to be an efficient approach to coherently www.videleaf.com improve metallic surfaces properties including those of Ti.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%