2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315418000164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioeroding sponge assemblages: the importance of substrate availability and sediment

Abstract: Despite global deterioration of coral reef health, not all reef-associated organisms are in decline. Bioeroding sponges are thought to be largely resistant to the factors that stress and kill corals, and are increasing in abundance on many reefs. However, there is a paucity of information on how environmental factors influence spatial variation in the distribution of these sponges, and how they might be affected by different stressors. We aimed to identify the factors that explained differences in bioeroding s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is needed to determine how these reefs function, how they differ from shallow water reefs, and if they are able to support shallower water communities, for example through larval subsides. There is also a need to quantify the importance of environmental parameters that might explain the depth-related patterns we have observed, as currently data are only available for shallow water (10–15 m) environments (see Powell et al ., 2014; Marlow et al ., 2018). Importantly, there has been discussion in the literature about the potential for shallow water coral reefs to transition to reefs dominated by other groups of organisms including sponges and soft coral (Bell et al ., 2013), and understanding the ecology of these deeper water reefs could provide insights into how altered shallow water reefs might function since they are already dominated by these groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further research is needed to determine how these reefs function, how they differ from shallow water reefs, and if they are able to support shallower water communities, for example through larval subsides. There is also a need to quantify the importance of environmental parameters that might explain the depth-related patterns we have observed, as currently data are only available for shallow water (10–15 m) environments (see Powell et al ., 2014; Marlow et al ., 2018). Importantly, there has been discussion in the literature about the potential for shallow water coral reefs to transition to reefs dominated by other groups of organisms including sponges and soft coral (Bell et al ., 2013), and understanding the ecology of these deeper water reefs could provide insights into how altered shallow water reefs might function since they are already dominated by these groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Fig. 1.Map of the Wakatobi Marine National Park, Indonesia, and location of two sites where the mesophotic reefs were sampled (adapted from Marlow et al ., 2018).
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proliferation of macroalgae on many degraded reefs has not just been attributed to increased substrate availability, but also reduced herbivory (overfishing/disease) and eutrophication (Hughes, 1994; Pandolfi et al ., 2005). In the Wakatobi, in the absence of large rivers and agriculture, chlorophyll a concentration is low (Marlow et al ., 2019) and eutrophication is not considered to be a problem. Conversely, local fishing pressure appears to exceed the maximum sustainable yield and the widespread use of unselective fish fences (Exton, 2010) is likely to be negatively affecting the local herbivorous fish population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys across the Wakatobi took place in July 2014 at 10 sites chosen to represent a variety of reef types and varying degrees of exposure to human activity (Figure 1; Appendix 1): Wangi, a turbid and sedimented reef within the harbour at Wangi-Wangi Island; Karang Gurita, a coral atoll located between Wangi and Kaledupa Islands; Buoy 3 and Ridge 1, steep-walled sites on the Hoga fringing reef; Pak Kasims, a sloping site on the Hoga fringing reef; Kaledupa 1 and Kaledupa Double Spur, two gentle sloping sites on the Kaledupa fringing reef; Sampela 1, on the Kalepupa fringing reef and adjacent to a Bajo village, considered to be highly degraded, sedimented and turbid (Bell & Smith, 2004; McMellor & Smith, 2010; Powell et al ., 2014); Tomia 1 and Tomia 2, gentle sloping sites on the Tomia fringing reef. While short-term environmental data are available for some of these sites (see Powell et al ., 2014; Biggerstaff et al ., 2015; Marlow et al ., 2019) including Sampela, B3 and Pak Kasims, we do not have environmental data from all sites.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, numerous studies have described the influence of local‐scale environmental factors on sponge abundance and assemblage composition (e.g. Bell & Barnes, 2000 a ; Powell et al ., 2014; Marlow et al ., 2019). Variability in sponge assemblages at small spatial scales resulting from local‐scale environmental conditions was not captured by our analysis.…”
Section: Global Variation In Sponge Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%