2017
DOI: 10.12816/0046227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Uropathogenic E. Coli : Comparison of Phenotypic and Molecular Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our results, previous studies found that biofilm-producing UPEC isolates had a higher degree of antibiotic resistance than non-biofilm producing isolates [ 39 , 40 ]. Insufficient antibiotic concentration and/or their delayed penetration into the deeper layers of biofilms are the major reasons for antibiotic resistance in biofilm structures [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to our results, previous studies found that biofilm-producing UPEC isolates had a higher degree of antibiotic resistance than non-biofilm producing isolates [ 39 , 40 ]. Insufficient antibiotic concentration and/or their delayed penetration into the deeper layers of biofilms are the major reasons for antibiotic resistance in biofilm structures [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Insufficient antibiotic concentration and/or their delayed penetration into the deeper layers of biofilms are the major reasons for antibiotic resistance in biofilm structures [ 17 , 18 ]. Despite this, amikacin and nitrofurantoin showed high efficacy against biofilm producers, and could be considered as the antibiotics of choice for treatment of biofilm structures [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 According to a study by Makled et al, nitrofurantoin could be considered as selective antibiotics against biofilm structures. 73 Also, our finding suggests that nitrofurantoin was also effective against most of the biofilm producers. The findings could aid in the treatment of initial infection when biofilm is not formed in the isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The 96-well flat polystyrene plates were used to test the biofilm inhibitory activity of compound OM1 and AuNPs-OM1 against four clinical microorganisms, including Gram-positive bacteria ( Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis ) and Gram-negative bacteria ( Pseudomonas areuginosa and Escherichia coli ) [ 61 ]. In brief, each well was filled with 180 µL of lysogeny broth (LB broth) and then inoculated with 10 µL of pathogenic bacteria, followed by the addition of 10 µL (final concentration of 250 µg/mL) of samples along with a control (without test sample).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%