3D Carbon Scaffolds for Neural Stem Cell Culture and Magnetic Resonance ImagingErwin Fuhrer, Anne Bäcker, Stephanie Kraft, Friederike J. Gruhl, Matthias Kirsch, Neil MacKinnon, Jan G. Korvink, and Swati Sharma* DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700915 the dimensionality of the culture system. Many in vitro assays are 2D substrate systems, which raises the question of the relevance to tissues that thrive in a 3D environment. Since it has been recognized that the scaffold topology imparts important cues for cell development and function, there has been a concerted effort to develop 3D scaffold systems that better reproduce the in vivo environment.Common materials used for 3D scaffold fabrication for various cell differentiation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth studies include commercially available Matrigel, hydrogels, and cryogels. [2] Matrigel is a gelatinous protein mixture that contains components of the basement membrane, such as laminin, collagen type IV, and entactin. [3] Hydrogels (water-containing polymer networks) are composed of either natural polymers such as collagen, hyaluronates, fibrin, and chitosan or synthetic polymers such as polyvinyl caprolactam and polyethylene glycol. [4] These materials are generally advantageous since a 3D hydrated network can be produced together with the desired chemical cues required for cell development (e.g., growth factors and cell adhesion promoters). In addition, the porous structure (size and shape) of the polymer network can be tuned by varying the freezing conditions and concentration of the cross-linker in the case of cryogels. [5,6] However, several disadvantages can be identified. Matrigel is often poorly chemically defined and thus culture-to-culture variation has been observed. [7] Hydrogels may require further chemical processing to introduce the important cellular chemical cues. [8] This introduces the potential for residual chemicals to be entrapped within the gel, influencing the reproducibility of cell development. These materials additionally have the potential to degrade after prolonged exposure to culture media. While not always an issue, in cases of extended culture times, cell cultures require a scaffold that will maintain its mechanical integrity. In this work, we propose glassy carbon as a material capable of overcoming these challenges.Conversion of polymer structures into glassy carbon using pyrolysis is a widespread process that is extensively used for the fabrication of carbon MEMS and NEMS, [9,10] battery and supercapacitor anodes, [11] and carbon nanofibers. [12,13] One very attractive yet rather unexplored feature of glassy carbon is its excellent cytocompatibility, [14][15][16][17][18] which, in combination with its mechanical strength, [9] inertness, and patternability, [10] makes it a very suitable material for the fabrication of 3D cell culture platforms.