Handbook of Dynamic Game Theory 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44374-4_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biology and Evolutionary Games

Abstract: This chapter surveys some evolutionary games used in biological sciences. These include the Hawk-Dove game, the Prisoner's Dilemma, Rock-Paper-Scissors, the war of attrition, the Habitat Selection game, predatorprey games, and signalling games.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method can be used to design experimental evolution experiments mimicking "evolutionary games" observed in cases when encounters of animals with antagonistic features within a population do not always escalate to fights (Smith 1982). e cooperative behavior suggests that selection acts on the population level, and is good for a species; this seems to contradict the Darwinian viewpoint that selection acts on the individual level, where individuals with di ferential fitness are always fighting (Broom and Krivan 2018). We are planning to apply siBar to compare the e fects of taking these two selection strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method can be used to design experimental evolution experiments mimicking "evolutionary games" observed in cases when encounters of animals with antagonistic features within a population do not always escalate to fights (Smith 1982). e cooperative behavior suggests that selection acts on the population level, and is good for a species; this seems to contradict the Darwinian viewpoint that selection acts on the individual level, where individuals with di ferential fitness are always fighting (Broom and Krivan 2018). We are planning to apply siBar to compare the e fects of taking these two selection strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%