2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biology of a deep-water sea anemone (Anthozoa: Actiniidae) from eastern Canada: Spawning, development, and growth

Abstract: Knowledge of the general biology and reproductive ecology of deep-water species can help predict their resilience to environmental and anthropogenic disturbances. The present study centers on live specimens of a deep-water sea anemone which were collected at bathyal depths between 1100 and 1400 m and kept in a mesocosm for over 6 years. Morphology and DNA sequencing confirmed that the species belongs to the genus Urticina. Male and female (9-10 cm pedal disk diameter, 90 tentacles) spawned 4 years post collect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a similar depth in the Pacific, introduced structures attracted new recruits of mostly meiofaunal taxa within weeks (Mullineaux, 1988). Even if new recruits were present, growth rates at comparable depths are typically too slow (Mercier et al, 2017;Girard et al, 2019) for individuals to reach a size that could be resolved in the ROV images in three months. It is also possible that recruitment would be higher on the hidden underside of the pipeline (where this was not covered in sediment) than the exposed top (Mullineaux, 1988), but that was not possible to detect in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a similar depth in the Pacific, introduced structures attracted new recruits of mostly meiofaunal taxa within weeks (Mullineaux, 1988). Even if new recruits were present, growth rates at comparable depths are typically too slow (Mercier et al, 2017;Girard et al, 2019) for individuals to reach a size that could be resolved in the ROV images in three months. It is also possible that recruitment would be higher on the hidden underside of the pipeline (where this was not covered in sediment) than the exposed top (Mullineaux, 1988), but that was not possible to detect in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%