2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00644-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and carbon pools of disturbed riparian forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Total aboveground biomass estimates were comparable to other biomass estimates of forested wetlands in the US (Giese et al 2003;Lockaby and Walbridge 1998;Mitsch et al 1991) but biomass was not significantly influenced by the landscape matrix. However, the distribution of biomass among forest canopy layers (overstory, midstory, and shrub) was influenced by patch density, forest cover, and impervious surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Total aboveground biomass estimates were comparable to other biomass estimates of forested wetlands in the US (Giese et al 2003;Lockaby and Walbridge 1998;Mitsch et al 1991) but biomass was not significantly influenced by the landscape matrix. However, the distribution of biomass among forest canopy layers (overstory, midstory, and shrub) was influenced by patch density, forest cover, and impervious surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Yang et al (2005) found a 41-year-old forest contained 149 Mg C ha À1 in the Yizhou State Forestry Center in Fujian Province, southeastern China. The difference in biomass C storage among these studies could be explained by differences in forest age, although other sources of variation such as management intensity and site quality might also contribute (Giese et al, 2003).…”
Section: Biomass C Storagementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Plants, nematodes and soil microbes did not respond equally to differences in land use and the positional gradient from the waterway, reflecting different spatial and temporal scales of influence on these groups of organisms. While microbial communities in grasslands still show the effects of cultivation even 70 years after such practices have ceased (Steenwerth et al 2003), plant communities can recover from such disturbance more quickly, especially when aided by active restoration (Giese et al 2003;Richardson et al 2007). Nematode communities, on the other hand, seemed to be most responsive to localized and seasonal resource availability and environmental conditions, instead of the larger landscape scale land use changes.…”
Section: Riparian Gradient and Land Use Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%