2005
DOI: 10.1139/b05-129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and nutrient responses of a clonal tundra sedge to climate warming

Abstract: We explored how climate change affects biomass, nutrient status, and late-season resource-allocation patterns in a rhizomatous tundra sedge, and how differentiation and development of ramets may constrain plant responses. We simulated climate warming for 5 years at a subarctic-alpine tundra site by using open-top chambers before destructively sampling clonal fragments of the dominant and widespread sedge, Carex bigelowii Torr. ex Schwein. We found differential growth response among ramets to experimental warmi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, arctic plants that respond to warming with earlier development tend to have lower N and P pools after 3 years of treatment (Michelsen et al ., ; Welker et al ., ), although there have also been reports of the converse (e.g. Carex bigelowii , Jónsdóttir et al ., ). This latter point may explain why phenology was less advanced in 2005, the third consecutive year of warming, than in 2004 (0.14 phenology index units difference vs. 0.08 units).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, arctic plants that respond to warming with earlier development tend to have lower N and P pools after 3 years of treatment (Michelsen et al ., ; Welker et al ., ), although there have also been reports of the converse (e.g. Carex bigelowii , Jónsdóttir et al ., ). This latter point may explain why phenology was less advanced in 2005, the third consecutive year of warming, than in 2004 (0.14 phenology index units difference vs. 0.08 units).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…N:P RE values <1 demonstrate higher efficiency in resorbing P with respect to N, as observed in most studies (Jiang et al, ; Vergutz et al, ). A possible explanation resides in the different mobility of N and P, with a larger proportion of N than of P locked in structural compounds (Jónsdóttir, Khitun, & Stenström, ). While at the global scale N:P resorption ratios reflect soil N and P stoichiometry (Reed, Townsend, Davidson, & Cleveland, ), we did not observe any significant relationship between N:P RE and soil N:P. This suggests that at the local scale, the differential efficiency in resorbing nutrients is determined more by the relative cost of resorbing nutrients than by the absolute soil nutrient levels and their stoichiometric ratio (Tang et al, ; Wright & Westoby, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better visualize this relationship, we used our LMMs to project values of N on the coastal plain across the growing season for different dates of peak NDVI (Fig. Warmer summer temperatures and accelerated phenology have been associated with increases in plant biomass, but reductions in concentrations of forage nitrogen (J onsd ottir et al 2005(J onsd ottir et al , Doiron et al 2014, although the responses of individual species are mixed (Welker et al 2005) and can exhibit complex dynamics (Zamin et al 2017). Earlier dates of peak NDVI were associated with earlier seasonal declines in forage N, resulting in particularly low N values late in the summer when female caribou need to amass body stores for future reproduction Parker 2008, Gustine et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%