2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass estimation across the benthic community in polluted freshwater sediment—A promising endpoint in microcosm studies?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the biomasses of the organisms were compared across different treatments, and the concentration showing a significant effect was as low as 5.2 mg/kg. The order of sensitivities of these 3 endpoints was biomass > diversity > abundance, which was consistent with the findings of Faupel et al (2011), who reported that biomass could be quantified to serve as a promising endpoint when studying ecotoxicology microcosms. Moreover, it is believed that biomass can provide more information than abundance data about a habitat's condition and that functional parameters, such as secondary production estimates, rely on biomass values (Reiss and Schmid‐Araya 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the biomasses of the organisms were compared across different treatments, and the concentration showing a significant effect was as low as 5.2 mg/kg. The order of sensitivities of these 3 endpoints was biomass > diversity > abundance, which was consistent with the findings of Faupel et al (2011), who reported that biomass could be quantified to serve as a promising endpoint when studying ecotoxicology microcosms. Moreover, it is believed that biomass can provide more information than abundance data about a habitat's condition and that functional parameters, such as secondary production estimates, rely on biomass values (Reiss and Schmid‐Araya 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In previous studies, the abundance, biomass, and community structure have been found to show significant differences under different levels of stress; and these indexes have been widely used in microcosms to assess sediment quality (Townsend et al 2009; Faupel et al 2012). Biomass has been recommended as a test endpoint in single‐species toxicity tests (Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development 2006, 2007) and provides the baseline data needed to perform energy‐flow and secondary productivity estimations and to assess a system's trophic status (Faupel et al 2011). In the present study, abundance, biodiversity, and biomass were calculated and measured for all field treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we confirmed literature data that demonstrated important damages caused by contaminated food on life history, like reproductive parameters (Geffard et al 2008), growth (Knops et al 2001), survival (Wang et al 2010), feeding rates (Rodgher and Espíndola 2008), and secondary production (Faupel et al 2011). These effects were detected in different phases of the organisms' life history, and impaired the viability of the organisms tested in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Secondary production is rarely included in biological assessments, although biomass accumulation has been recommended as endpoint in single-species toxicity testing (OECD 2006(OECD , 2007. Secondary production rates provide the baseline data needed to assess energy flow and trophic status in aquatic ecosystems, and illustrate aspects related to the ecological fitness of organisms (Faupel et al 2011). Indeed, it is well established that secondary production is one of the major energy flow pathways in most freshwater ecosystems (Faupel et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In marine microcosms, Louati et al [35] showed that under nutrient-limited conditions bacterial communities respond more strongly to the presence of meiofauna than to PAH contamination, whereas meiofauna are distinctly disturbed by PAHs. These results agree with those of a freshwater microcosm study in which bacterial biomass was not affected by cadmium treatment whereas both meiofauna and protozoa showed a strong decrease in biomass [36]. The effect of NPs on the structure and function of bacterial and faunal communities in freshwater systems has yet to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%