2014
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Changes After Repeated Collagen Cross-Linking on Human Corneas Assessed In Vitro Using Scanning Acoustic Microscopy

Abstract: A significant increase in speed of sound was found in all treated groups compared with the control group; however, the difference among the treated groups is not significant, suggesting no further cross-links are induced when collagen cross-linking treatment is repeated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to test the hypothesis that C post and C consumption% were key factors to achieve effective outcome of corneal cross‐linking, we correlated these measurements with the induced stiffening effect on the anterior stroma of 10 eye bank donor tissues. After treatment, the Young's modulus of elasticity of the anterior stroma increased by 1.02 to 1.58 times in comparison with baseline measurements, which showed a fair agreement with previous studies . The increased biomechanical strengthening of the stroma was highly significantly correlated with the intrastromal concentration of riboflavin prior to UV‐A illumination of the cornea and the consumption of intrastromal riboflavin caused by UV‐A illumination of the cornea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to test the hypothesis that C post and C consumption% were key factors to achieve effective outcome of corneal cross‐linking, we correlated these measurements with the induced stiffening effect on the anterior stroma of 10 eye bank donor tissues. After treatment, the Young's modulus of elasticity of the anterior stroma increased by 1.02 to 1.58 times in comparison with baseline measurements, which showed a fair agreement with previous studies . The increased biomechanical strengthening of the stroma was highly significantly correlated with the intrastromal concentration of riboflavin prior to UV‐A illumination of the cornea and the consumption of intrastromal riboflavin caused by UV‐A illumination of the cornea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Confocal imaging could theoretically improve the UV‐A device's axial resolution and allow for analysis of intrastromal riboflavin at increasing depth of the cornea; on the other hand, the concentration of riboflavin has been shown to be almost constant up to 320 to 350 μm stromal depth (keratoconus corneas have in general stromal thickness thinner than 400 μm) and the effect of biomechanical strengthening has been measured to be mainly limited to the anterior 250 μm stromal depth . Therefore, increasing complexity in the system would not lead to a real advantage in the outcome measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, scanning microscopy techniques have been used to evaluate the changes of the elastic properties of porcine and human corneas after riboflavin/UV-A cross-linking [ 15 17 ]. Dias et al [ 16 ] used micrometer-sized spherical indenters (59–74 μm diameter) and 10.4 N/m cantilever to probe the stroma at different depths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the results from previous AFM studies have provided quantitative information on the depth-dependent profiles of the Young’s modulus, showing that the stiffening effect of corneal cross-linking is mainly limited to the anterior 220 μm stromal depth. Beshtawi et al [ 15 ] used scanning acoustic microscopy to explore the biomechanical changes induced by cross-linking in donor human corneas. The speed of sound in the anterior region between the cross-linked and control corneas was increased by a factor of 1.05, in fair accordance with this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, samples that were cross-linked two or three times failed to show an additive increase in speed of sound and stiffness when compared to samples that underwent CXL only once. 7 Several experimental differences make it hard to compare these results with our own observation. First, repetitive CXL was performed within 24 hours in an ex vivo tissue, which only allowed immediate and mid-term changes to occur after CXL, whereas in our case, 4 years passed between the two procedures, allowing for longterm changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%