2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14515-5_144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Differences of Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation in Stabilization of TLIF or ALIF Condition - A Finite Element Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although MIS-TLIF is favored compared to open TLIF [ 10 ], its efficacy and safety depends on surgeon expertise, which could be further enhanced through recent technological developments such as imaging and guiding techniques. The prime objective of fusion is to stabilize degenerated lumber segments through minimizing movement, relaxing spinal nerve, and lowering the pain [ 11 ]. The fusion stability is critically affected by suitable positioning of the pedicle screw [ 12 ], and therefore, continuous effort is being made to improve screw design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MIS-TLIF is favored compared to open TLIF [ 10 ], its efficacy and safety depends on surgeon expertise, which could be further enhanced through recent technological developments such as imaging and guiding techniques. The prime objective of fusion is to stabilize degenerated lumber segments through minimizing movement, relaxing spinal nerve, and lowering the pain [ 11 ]. The fusion stability is critically affected by suitable positioning of the pedicle screw [ 12 ], and therefore, continuous effort is being made to improve screw design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%