Marathon Running: Physiology, Psychology, Nutrition and Training Aspects 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29728-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics of Marathon Running

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was most evident in runners and cyclists, but not as prominent in swimmers, which is likely due to the large disparity in cyclic movement frequencies between different distance events in running and cycling disciplines when compared to swimming. Indeed, there is a much lower discrepancy between the typical stroke rate of swimmers competing in different distance events (i.e., mean freestyle stroke rate range: ~44 to 58 cycles•min -1 from sprint-to longdistance events) 18,19 , when compared to different distance events within both cycling (i.e., mean cadence range: ~70 to 150 rev•min -1 ) 20,21 and running (i.e., mean stride rate range: ~90 -280 strides•min -1 ) 22,23 . It is also worth highlighting that the typical mean stroke rate of sprint swimmers (~58 cycles•min -1 ) 18 is substantially lower than the cycling stroke rate equivalent (i.e., mean cadence) of track sprint cyclists (~150 revolutions•min -1 ) 20 and the mean stride rate of track sprint runners (~280 strides•min -1 ) 22 , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was most evident in runners and cyclists, but not as prominent in swimmers, which is likely due to the large disparity in cyclic movement frequencies between different distance events in running and cycling disciplines when compared to swimming. Indeed, there is a much lower discrepancy between the typical stroke rate of swimmers competing in different distance events (i.e., mean freestyle stroke rate range: ~44 to 58 cycles•min -1 from sprint-to longdistance events) 18,19 , when compared to different distance events within both cycling (i.e., mean cadence range: ~70 to 150 rev•min -1 ) 20,21 and running (i.e., mean stride rate range: ~90 -280 strides•min -1 ) 22,23 . It is also worth highlighting that the typical mean stroke rate of sprint swimmers (~58 cycles•min -1 ) 18 is substantially lower than the cycling stroke rate equivalent (i.e., mean cadence) of track sprint cyclists (~150 revolutions•min -1 ) 20 and the mean stride rate of track sprint runners (~280 strides•min -1 ) 22 , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might also be related to the fact that people over 45 are in a less exploratory phase of their lives, and thus do not perceive reasons to seek for different types of sports to practice [ 50 ]. Another explanation might be that these ‘older’ runners are more experienced and therefore, more aware of their bodies and potential injuries [ 30 , 51 ]. This is in line with a previous study, indicating that the most experienced runners included most runners being older than 45 [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Running experience influenced both social and individual reasons to quit negatively, where runners who run for more than 5 years perceive less (social and individual) reasons to quit as compared to runners running for less than a year. We can hypothesize that runners who already have been running for more than 5 years have already been able to overcome obstacles and barriers (e.g., injuries or motivational loss) throughout the years and kept pursuing running [ 30 , 51 ]. On the other hand, participants running for less than a year might have a lower self-efficacy, i.e., confidence in one’s ability to overcome potential obstacles [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Running on a positive slope is associated with an increase in total muscle volume activated in the lower extremity (Sloniger et al, 1997), with a tendency to mid/forefoot strike, higher stride frequency and decreased stride length when compared to level running, resulting in an increased internal mechanical work, shorter aerial phase duration, longer time spent in stance (Padulo et al, 2013; Vernillo et al, 2017). Up to around 90% maximum velocity, speed increments are mainly met by increased stride length, resulting in more time spent on the swing phase (Dugan & Bhat, 2005; Mann & Hagy, 1980; Novacheck, 1998; Stöggl & Wunsch, 2016). Increased stride frequency will be more significant in attaining higher speeds only when velocity approaches maximum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%