2002
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200208)23:15<2490::aid-elps2490>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomic study of human myeloid leukemia cells differentiation to macrophages using DNA array, proteomic, and bioinformatic analytical methods

Abstract: A biomic approach by integrating three independent methods, DNA microarray, proteomics and bioinformatics, is used to study the differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cell line HL-60 into macrophages when induced by 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Analysis of gene expression changes at the RNA level using cDNA against an array of 6033 human genes showed that 5950 (98.6%) of the genes were expressed in the HL-60 cells. A total of 624 genes (10.5%) were found to be regulated during HL-60 cell dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The labeled targets were hybridized on commercial 7.6 K cDNA microarrays representing approximately 7500 distinct human transcripts (Egenomix Human UniversoChip 8K; Egenomix Technology Corporation, Taipei) with detail description reported earlier (Juan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Mmp-2 Activity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labeled targets were hybridized on commercial 7.6 K cDNA microarrays representing approximately 7500 distinct human transcripts (Egenomix Human UniversoChip 8K; Egenomix Technology Corporation, Taipei) with detail description reported earlier (Juan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Mmp-2 Activity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) combined with protein identification by mass spectrometry has already defined differences in hematopoietic cell lines which occur during differentiation or as a result of BCR/ABL oncogene expression. [4][5][6][7] These approaches relied on intergel sample comparison using silver or Coomassie blue stains, which have a low dynamic range and thus could be subject to the inherent limitations of this classical experimental approach. The development of protein labeling techniques employing fluorescent dyes with distinct excitation/ emission spectra but with the same chemical reactivity 8,9 enables multiplexing of 2 or more samples so that they can be processed and run on the same gel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After sonication, 500 mg of total protein was loaded into immobilized pH gradient (IPG) gel strips (pH 3-10 or pH 4-7, 18 cm long; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). For the first-dimensional separation, isoelectric focusing was carried out using the IPGphor system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at 20jC with 8000 V for a total of 65 kVh as previously described (15). After isoelectric focusing, the IPG strips were equilibrated for 15 minutes then attached with 0.5% agarose to the top of a vertical 12.5% SDSpolyacrylamide gel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After isoelectric focusing, the IPG strips were equilibrated for 15 minutes then attached with 0.5% agarose to the top of a vertical 12.5% SDSpolyacrylamide gel. Second-dimensional electrophoresis was carried out with Protean II Multi-Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as previously described (15). The gels were fixed and stained in 350 mL of the Sypro Ruby Protein Gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) stain solution overnight, then the residual dye was washed out of the polyacrylamide matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation