2017 IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/isba.2017.7947693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BioSoft - a multimodal biometric database incorporating soft traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, to categorize individuals or compare them using height attribute will result in qualitative terms using categorical or comparative method. In soft biometrics research, a large number of datasets are annotated using stated two methods and using one or both types of annotations [173].…”
Section: Annotation Processes and Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to categorize individuals or compare them using height attribute will result in qualitative terms using categorical or comparative method. In soft biometrics research, a large number of datasets are annotated using stated two methods and using one or both types of annotations [173].…”
Section: Annotation Processes and Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, collecting a diverse training set within a long-term real-world HRI scenario is very challenging. To the best of our knowledge, the only publicly available dataset that contains the soft biometrics used in our system (except for the time of interaction) with a dataset of faces is BioSoft [74]. However, due to the low number of subjects (75), and the lack of numeric height values, we decided to create our own Multi-modal Long-term User Recognition Dataset.…”
Section: Multi-modal Long-term User Recognition Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The face, hand, and iris attributes for the same person were included in our multimodal biometric database (MULBv1); these traits were not included simultaneously in other databases. Voice, 2D face [11] 2003 BANCA 202 12 2 2D face, voice [12] 2003 MYCT 330 1 2 Fingerprint, signature [13] 2005 MyIDEA 104 3 6 Voice, face, signature, fingerprints, hand geometry, handwriting [14] 2006 M3 32 3 3 Voice, 2D face, fingerprint [15] 2007 BioSec 250 4 4 Voice, 2D face, fingerprint, iris [16] 2008 IV 2 300 1 3 Iris, 2D and 3D face [17] 2011 SDUMLA-HMT 106 -5 Gait, iris, finger vein, 2D face [18] 2012 BIOMENT 91 3 2 2D face, fingerprint [19] 2015 DMCSv1 35 2 2 Hand, 3D face [20] 2017 The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: the properties of the MULBv1 database are fully explained in section 2. The case study for face recognition using a deep convolution neural network is shown in section 3 utilizing the face sub-database for the MULBv1 database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%