2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7140079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biped gait controller for large speed variations, combining reflexes and a central pattern generator in a neuromuscular model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K swing p is the position gain on the leg angle, K swing d is the velocity gain, α is the leg angle andα is the leg angular velocity (see Figure 3). More concisely, the swing parameters that we focus on in our optimization are the following: 1) K swing p : Position gain on feedback on leg angle 2) K swing d : Velocity gain on feedback on leg velocity 3) α 0 : Nominal leg angle 4) C d : Gain on the horizontal distance between the stance foot and CoM 5) C v : Gain on the horizontal velocity of the CoM 6) l clr : Desired leg clearance Though originally developed for explaining human neural control pathways, these controllers have recently been applied to robots and prosthetics, for example in [19] and [20]. As demonstrated in [18], these models are indeed capable of generating a variety of locomotion behaviours for a humanoid model -for example, walking on flat, rough ground, turning, running, walking upstairs and on ramps.…”
Section: B Optimization For Bipedal Locomotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K swing p is the position gain on the leg angle, K swing d is the velocity gain, α is the leg angle andα is the leg angular velocity (see Figure 3). More concisely, the swing parameters that we focus on in our optimization are the following: 1) K swing p : Position gain on feedback on leg angle 2) K swing d : Velocity gain on feedback on leg velocity 3) α 0 : Nominal leg angle 4) C d : Gain on the horizontal distance between the stance foot and CoM 5) C v : Gain on the horizontal velocity of the CoM 6) l clr : Desired leg clearance Though originally developed for explaining human neural control pathways, these controllers have recently been applied to robots and prosthetics, for example in [19] and [20]. As demonstrated in [18], these models are indeed capable of generating a variety of locomotion behaviours for a humanoid model -for example, walking on flat, rough ground, turning, running, walking upstairs and on ramps.…”
Section: B Optimization For Bipedal Locomotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common muscle synergies exist between walking and standing (Chvatal and Ting, 2013 ), meaning that one neural control model could potentially be applied to walking and standing. Previously, a reflex controller was shown to replicate normal human walking (Geyer and Herr, 2010 ; Song and Geyer, 2015 ), which has since been applied to control exoskeletons (Wu et al, 2017 ), prostheses (Eilenberg et al, 2010 ), and a humanoid robot (Van der Noot et al, 2015 ), and was extended, for example to include frontal muscles as well (Song and Geyer, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models considered the CPGs as a generator of rhythmic motor commands [29, 30]. Some of CPG-based models represent hierarchical controller inspired by the biological structure of human motion [31], especially by coupling reflexes to the CPGs to control biped motion [32, 33]. One of the effects of reflexes on CPGs is known as phase resetting [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%