1951
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1951.tb02469.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth Weight and Gestation Time in Relation to Maternal Age, Parity and Infant Survival

Abstract: The articles published by the Annals of Eugenics (1925–1954) have been made available online as an historical archive intended for scholarly use. The work of eugenicists was often pervaded by prejudice against racial, ethnic and disabled groups. The online publication of this material for scholarly research purposes is not an endorsement of those views nor a promotion of eugenics in any way.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
187
2
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
15
187
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A clear example of stabilising selection operating on growth rate comes from the classic work of Karn andPenrose (1951, see also Gordon, 1977) on human birth weight: newborn infants of intermediate birth weights had higher viabilities than those of more extreme weights. Since, in man at least, birth weight is more dependent on maternal genotype and maternal environment than on foetal genotype (which contributes about 24 per cent of birth weight variance, Robson, 1978), it is likely to be a poor character to use in man (and probably other mammals) in searches for heterozygosity/growth rate correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear example of stabilising selection operating on growth rate comes from the classic work of Karn andPenrose (1951, see also Gordon, 1977) on human birth weight: newborn infants of intermediate birth weights had higher viabilities than those of more extreme weights. Since, in man at least, birth weight is more dependent on maternal genotype and maternal environment than on foetal genotype (which contributes about 24 per cent of birth weight variance, Robson, 1978), it is likely to be a poor character to use in man (and probably other mammals) in searches for heterozygosity/growth rate correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its consequences are more often maintenance of the status quo than systematic changes in gene frequencies. There is evidence that the modal phenotypes in a population have the highest reproductive fitness (Rendel, 1943;Karn and Penrose, 1951;Jayant, 1966). The optimum phenotype itself changes with shifts in gene frequency or in the environment and it is assumed that the modal phenotype is a result of natural selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in these cases little is known about the genetic control of the character. Birth weight in man has been shown to have a central optimum value (Karn and Penrose, 1951 ;Jayant, 1966). Thoday (1958) has argued that sternopleural chaeta number in Drosophila rnelanogaster is a character of adaptive significance as it is affected by natural selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%