2007
DOI: 10.1107/s1600536807013293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bis(N,N-dibenzylthiocarbamoyl) disulfide

Abstract: In the title compound, C30H28N2S4, the S—S bond length is 1.9910 (13) Å. In the absence of classical hydrogen bonds and π–π inter­actions, the crystal packing is stabilized by van der Waals forces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two C–S bond lengths are different and correspond to formal single [C–S; C(11)–S(2) = 1.8003(17) and C(21)–S(3) = 1.8015(17)] and double [CS; C(11)–S(1) = 1.6384(4) and C(21)–S(4) = 1.6330(17)] bonds. The C–N bond in the compound’s dithiocarbamate unit was observed to be shorter when compared to the normal C–N single bond, which is 1.47 Å, and this signifies a partial bond character in the C–N bond length that is C(11)–N(2) = 1.364(2) and C(21)–N(3) = 1.368(2). , The CS, C–S, and C–N bond lengths measured are comparable to those of related structures in literature. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two C–S bond lengths are different and correspond to formal single [C–S; C(11)–S(2) = 1.8003(17) and C(21)–S(3) = 1.8015(17)] and double [CS; C(11)–S(1) = 1.6384(4) and C(21)–S(4) = 1.6330(17)] bonds. The C–N bond in the compound’s dithiocarbamate unit was observed to be shorter when compared to the normal C–N single bond, which is 1.47 Å, and this signifies a partial bond character in the C–N bond length that is C(11)–N(2) = 1.364(2) and C(21)–N(3) = 1.368(2). , The CS, C–S, and C–N bond lengths measured are comparable to those of related structures in literature. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“… 39 , 40 The C=S, C–S, and C–N bond lengths measured are comparable to those of related structures in literature. 41 , 42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Sb−N bond lengths in {SbBr 2 Py} + cations (2.244–2.304 Å) are shorter to those in {SbBr 2 Py 2 } + (2.355–2.433 Å) and {SbBr 3 Py 2 } (2.391–2.398 Å) fragments which, in turn, are shorter than those in {SbBr 3 Py} molecule (2.590–2.620 Å). Note that the Sb‐N distances in {SbBr 2 Py 2 } + and {SbBr 3 Py 2 } fragments (2.355–2.433 Å) are longer to those in SbBr 3 complexes with bidentate ligand 1,10‐phenanthroline (2.239–2.408 Å) [63, 64] . In all studied complexes, all antimony atoms display pseudo‐octahedral coordination geometry which is achieved by both covalent Sb−Br, Sb−N bonds and short intermolecular Sb⋅⋅⋅Br contacts with neighboring species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Values for and for structures in the Cambridge Structural Database (Web CSD v1.1.1; Groom et al, 2016) were determined using Mercury (Macrae et al, 2008). These structures are: METHUS (Marøy, 1965), METHUS01 (Ymé n, 1983), METHUS02 (Wang et al, 1986), METHUS03 (Wang & Liao, 1989), METHUS04 (Wang & Liao, 1989), ETHUSS (Karle et al, 1967) ETHUSS01 (Wang et al, 1986), ETHUSS02 (Wang & Liao, 1989), ETHUSS03 (Wang & Liao, 1989), ETHUSS04 (Shi & Wang, 1992), ETHUSS05 (Hu, 2000), HIQJUM (Jian et al, 1999), HIQJUM01 (Yu & Wang, 2003), JECYAZ (Kumar et al, 1990), TIBFEQ (Zhai et al, 2007), ZEMPUC (Hall & Tiekink, 1995), KAZHEA (Karim et al, 2012), NELTUT (Fun et al, 2001), XEBJOF (Ajibade et al, 2012), JAXPOO (Raya et al, 2005), CAPLEK (Williams et al, 1983), CAPLEK01 (Ymé n, 1983), CAPLEK02 (Yamin et al, 1996), CAPLEK03 (Bai et al, 2010), RISNEN (Quan et al, 2008), ULOXIC (Bodige & Watson, 2003), PIPTHS (Dix & Rae, 1973), PIPTHS01 (Shi & Wang, 1992), EWESUW (Nath et al, 2016), BOMPAU (Rout et al, 1982), VOHFIH (Polyakova & Starikova, 1990), VOHFIH01 (Ivanov et al, 2003), PECWOL…”
Section: Database Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%