2018
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b08297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisulfite-Free, Nanoscale Analysis of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine at Single Base Resolution

Abstract: High-resolution detection of genome-wide 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) sites of small-scale samples remains challenging. Here, we present hmC-CATCH, a bisulfite-free, base-resolution method for the genome-wide detection of 5hmC. hmC-CATCH is based on selective 5hmC oxidation, chemical labeling and subsequent C-to-T transition during PCR. Requiring only nanoscale input genomic DNA samples, hmC-CATCH enabled us to detect genome-wide hydroxymethylome of human embryonic stem cells in a cost-effective manner. Furt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…including affinity-based methods (5hmC-DIP-Seq, CMS-Seq, GLIB and hMe-Seal) and high-resolution methods (oxBS-Seq, TAB-Seq, hmC-CATCH, TAPS and ACE-Seq) 20,21 . For instance, we previously developed hmC-CATCH 22 , which is a bisulfitefree method for genome-wide detection of 5hmC. hmC-CATCH couples selective chemical labeling and biotin pulldown [22][23][24][25] , thus allowing 5hmC enrichment and detection at single-base resolution.…”
Section: Different Methods Have Been Developed To Map the Genomic Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…including affinity-based methods (5hmC-DIP-Seq, CMS-Seq, GLIB and hMe-Seal) and high-resolution methods (oxBS-Seq, TAB-Seq, hmC-CATCH, TAPS and ACE-Seq) 20,21 . For instance, we previously developed hmC-CATCH 22 , which is a bisulfitefree method for genome-wide detection of 5hmC. hmC-CATCH couples selective chemical labeling and biotin pulldown [22][23][24][25] , thus allowing 5hmC enrichment and detection at single-base resolution.…”
Section: Different Methods Have Been Developed To Map the Genomic Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, we previously developed hmC-CATCH 22 , which is a bisulfitefree method for genome-wide detection of 5hmC. hmC-CATCH couples selective chemical labeling and biotin pulldown [22][23][24][25] , thus allowing 5hmC enrichment and detection at single-base resolution. While hydroxymethylome maps have been obtained for mammalian cell lines and mouse tissues, 5hmC profiles in human tissues are poorly characterized thus far.…”
Section: Different Methods Have Been Developed To Map the Genomic Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its utility in detecting genome‐wide 5hmC was not demonstrated. We recently developed a bisulfite‐free, genome‐wide, and base‐resolution 5hmC sequencing method termed chemical‐assisted C‐to‐T conversion of 5hmC sequencing (hmC‐CATCH) . hmC‐CATCH is based on the selective oxidation of 5hmC to 5fC, and subsequent labeling of newly generated 5fC by using derivatives of 1,3‐indandione (Scheme ); endogenous 5fC is first blocked before the oxidation reaction.…”
Section: Bisulfite‐free Chemical Labeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently developed ab isulfite-free, genome-wide, and base-reso-lution 5hmC sequencing method termed chemical-assisted Cto-T conversion of 5hmC sequencing (hmC-CATCH). [45] hmC-CATCH is based on the selectiveoxidation of 5hmC to 5fC, and subsequentl abeling of newly generated 5fCb yu sing derivatives of 1,3-indandione( Scheme 6);e ndogenous 5fCi sf irst blockedb efore the oxidation reaction. Importantly,w es howed that K 2 RuO 4 ,b ut not KRuO 4 ,m ediated very mild oxidation of DNA.…”
Section: Chemical-labeling-enabled Single-base-resolution Sequencing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our lab reported another bisulfite‐free, base‐resolution 5hmC detection method called hmC‐CATCH seq . hmC‐CATCH combines a mild, selective 5hmC oxidation reaction with an established 5fC labeling and detection method, allowing 5hmC detection in limited amount of biological and clinical samples.…”
Section: Single‐cell Profiling Methods For Dna Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%