Shellfish Aquaculture and the Environment 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470960967.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bivalve Shellfish Aquaculture and Eutrophication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding of negligible or only localized effects of the East Creek FLUPSY is consistent with that for 93% of 62 other ecosystems studied (Burkholder & Shumway 2011). Overall, the chemical ecology of East Creek was little affected by the oyster nursery, and the few effects detected were not unexpected, based upon previous literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our finding of negligible or only localized effects of the East Creek FLUPSY is consistent with that for 93% of 62 other ecosystems studied (Burkholder & Shumway 2011). Overall, the chemical ecology of East Creek was little affected by the oyster nursery, and the few effects detected were not unexpected, based upon previous literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Measurements considered both water-column and sediment chemistry, with a focus on macronutrients and chemical compounds associated with hypoxia to address concerns about possible, adverse environmental impacts of bivalve shellfish aquaculture (Davenport et al 2000, Prins & Escaravage 2005, Burkholder & Shumway 2011. Characterization of the temporal variability of the embayment revealed conditions typical of many small, coastal embayments suitable for oyster aquaculture; therefore, these results should be widely applicable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The organic enrichment effects of organic biodeposition by commercial mussel culture operations have been reviewed on several occasions and tend to be either negligible or localized (e.g. Burkholder & Shumway 2011, McKindsey et al 2011. Larger-scale adverse impacts have been observed under site-specific conditions of relatively poor water flushing, high culture density, shallow water, and/or the presence of additional sources of organic enrichment (Hargrave et al 2008a, Cranford et al 2009).…”
Section: Biomitigation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evaluations of the effects of shading due to oyster culture in suspended bags and hanging culture of floating oyster bags showed reduced eelgrass structure, morphometrics and photosynthesis observed at 26% reduction in subsurface irradiance, but design of the structures was clearly important, as the floating bags only reduced eelgrass directly below the structures (Bulmer et al 2012, Skinner et al 2014. Bivalves have also been shown to enhance seagrass growth by supplying nutrients via biodeposits and by improving water clarity via filtration, especially where nutrients in sediment limit seagrass growth and in eutrophic waters where phytoplankton blooms cause shading effects (Peterson & Heck 2001, Booth & Heck 2009, Burkholder & Shumway 2011. Though nutrients in sediment porewater were enhanced by the presence of oysters in Willapa Bay and oysters measurably cleared the water (Wheat & Ruesink 2013), only eelgrass shoot size was affected by oysters at the local scale , suggesting that seagrass response differs depending on estuarine conditions.…”
Section: Open Pen Access Ccessmentioning
confidence: 99%