2008
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.2008.4564763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind detection of on-off keying for free-space optical communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main drawback of this method is the trade-off between throughput and performance. A blind detection scheme for the case where there is no channel knowledge with the background-noise limited and a sub-optimum maximum-likelihood detection based Rxs was studied in [13] and [14], respectively. However, the performances of these schemes are rather poor for small observation windows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of this method is the trade-off between throughput and performance. A blind detection scheme for the case where there is no channel knowledge with the background-noise limited and a sub-optimum maximum-likelihood detection based Rxs was studied in [13] and [14], respectively. However, the performances of these schemes are rather poor for small observation windows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After using the likelihood function for MIMO OW systems, as in (9), the log-likelihood function for the complete data in vector form is obtained by (10) After dropping some unnecessary terms, (10) reduces to (11) or equivalently (12) At the E-step of the th iteration of the algorithm, the log-likelihood function for the complete data is calculated, conditioned on the received sequence and the th estimate of the transmitted sequence . Hence, based on (11) or (12) we obtain (13) where (14) and is the number of the bits of the th estimate of the transmitted sequence that correspond to the ON-state. A better estimate of the transmitted sequence, , is obtained at the second step of the th iteration of the algorithm, the M-step. M-step performs the maximization of (13), which yields (15) Since the transmitted data bits are randomly chosen, i.e., no coding scheme is employed, maximizing (15) over the -bit sequences is equivalent to making symbol-by-symbol decisions on each bit.…”
Section: Em-based Sequence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose EM algorithm as a low-complexity solution for MLSD in the MIMO OW system under consideration. As benchmarks, we also investigate the performance of symbol-by-symbol ML detector, blind detector of [14], PSAM, and MLSD in a MIMO scenario. The proposed detector outperforms symbol-by-symbol ML detector, blind detector, and PSAM methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requirement results in a complex receiver design [26], [34]. Signal detection can rely on a maximum likelihood (ML) detector to achieve optimal performance for the fading case [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%