Blood, Sweat, and Tears: Navigating Creepy versus Cool in Wearable Biotech

Abstract

This paper considers how personal data protections figure into the design process of wearable technology. The data question is becoming especially important in the face of recent innovations in biotechnology that capitalize on the new fungibility of biology and electronics, in which new biotech wearables capitalize on the ability to analyze and track changes in blood, sweat, and tears. Interviews and participant observation with wearable tech designers, data scientists, fashion tech entrepreneurs, and select experts in cybersecurity and intellectual property law, reveal a range of approaches to data protection in design within the culture where wearables are beginning to merge with biotech. While a few respondents were extremely vigilant about protecting consumer's privacy, the majority felt that when consumers 'opt in' to data sharing, they should be cognizant of the risks. From their perspective, it is not necessarily the producer's responsibility to protect user's personal data. These attitudes present a problematic logic, which leaves users vulnerable to data exploitation. The paper concludes by arguing that this laissez-faire culture is the environment in which wearable biotech is being developed and will be deployed. This emerging technology raises issues about bodies, data, and ownership in crucial need of analysis and critique to push its move into the mainstream toward more equitable and inclusive ends.

Communication privacy management for smart speaker use: Integrating the role of privacy self-efficacy and the multidimensional view

“…The success of an IoT product largely depends on its ability to collect and utilize user information, while adequately addressing users’ privacy concerns (e.g. Wissinger, 2018). For smart speaker developers and manufacturers, our study results suggest that promoting privacy self-efficacy among users will encourage users to share more information with smart speakers and allow third parties to access their data to fully exploit the benefits of smart speakers, while also protecting their privacy more carefully.…”

‘Build a future champion’: Exploring a branded activity-tracking platform for children and parents

“…The policy (e privacy policy (Nestlé, 2018) demonstrates a prevailing cultural logic of ‘intensive parenting’ (boyd, 2014: 71–72), encouraging parents to engage in ‘intimate surveillance’ (Leaver, 2017: 2) and share their data on their children’s behalf. Wissinger (2018) describes the contestation between ‘creepy’ and ‘cool’ in the privacy implications surrounding wearables. Milo touches briefly on monitoring and surveillance in its FAQs, but the parental concerns they anticipate are straw-man examples; related to sensors that their devices do not include (such as GPS units), and do not address the realities of datafication.…”

Wearable Technology in the Perception of Young Consumers

“…In 2018, a completely new approach to the WT was shown. They began to interfere more in the lives of consumers by designing things that were part of their everyday lives, with additional functionality and sensors, such as intelligent jewellery, duvets or sleeping bags (Wissinger, 2018;Biswas et al, 2018). There is also a classification of these devices as components of the Internet of Things ecosystem (Maglogiannis et al, 2018;Srinivasa et al, 2018;Koo, Fallon, 2018;Tussyadiah, Jung, Dieck, 2018).…”