2017
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months

Abstract: The trail was not registered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
114
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent publication provides an answer to the question, but the results must be interpreted with caution; according to Forde et al. (2018), upper arch alignment remains equally stable with removable and fixed retainers …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A recent publication provides an answer to the question, but the results must be interpreted with caution; according to Forde et al. (2018), upper arch alignment remains equally stable with removable and fixed retainers …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages and disadvantages of removable and fixed retainers can also determine the choice. Removable retainers are easy to clean, but compliance is difficult, even when the retainer only has to be worn at night . If not worn as prescribed, relapse may occur .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations