Bone Mineral Density Changes Following Burn Injury

Edelman, Linda S.; McNaught, Teresa; Chan, Gcf; Morris, Stephen

doi:10.1097/00004630-200203002-00088

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Conversely, Edelman et al also studied 29 children and adults with thermal injuries and found no statistically significant changes in bone mineral density in muscle and fat mass during the acute period following their injuries (14). However, they did find significant changes in muscle mass, fat mass and bone mineral density at 90, 138 and 131 days post-burn, respectively (14). Leblebici et al measured bone mineral density in a group of patients and found bone loss during the first post-burn month in the left distal forearm and in the L1-L4 vertebrae.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Edelman et al used a murine burn model to show that significant changes in bone density could be measured within 10 days after a burn injury (13). Conversely, Edelman et al also studied 29 children and adults with thermal injuries and found no statistically significant changes in bone mineral density in muscle and fat mass during the acute period following their injuries (14). However, they did find significant changes in muscle mass, fat mass and bone mineral density at 90, 138 and 131 days post-burn, respectively (14).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is assumed that bone loss will be higher in patients who have a relatively high percentage of TBSA that was burnt. In the studies that focussed on children with a TBSA burn rate of greater than 40% who suffered bone mineral loss, a reduction in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, along with an increased risk of fracture and osteoporosis at the beginning of adulthood, was observed (14,15). Miller et al found that the severity of bone loss appeared to be related to the severity of the injury (6), whereas Leblebici et al determined that the severity of bone loss was not correlated with the TBSA burn rate or the severity of the burn injury (16).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bone Loss During the Acute Stage Following Burn Injury: Is it Local Or Systemic?

Analan¹,

Leblebici²,

Adam³

et al. 2016

West Indian Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:To examine post-burn bone loss and determine whether it was local or diffuse. Methods: Thirty-six patients with burn injuries were investigated, and the total body surface area of the burns and their locations were recorded. The bone mineral densities of the lumbar 1-4 vertebrae, bilateral distal forearm, and bilateral proximal femur of the patients were recorded, and these were compared with the measurements of the non-burnt extremity. Results: No statistically significant correlations existed among the total body surface area of the burns, their severity and the z-scores. In addition, when comparing the z-scores of the burnt extremity with those of the non-burnt extremity, no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, a remarkable decrease in bone mass occurred during the second month following the burn injuries. The post-burn bone loss could not be correlated with the severity of the burns, but these injuries caused systemic bone loss. ReSuMenObjetivo: Examinar la pérdida ósea después de una quemadura y determinar si era local o difusa. Métodos: Se investigó a 36 pacientes con lesiones por quemaduras y se registró el área total de la superficie del cuerpo con quemaduras y sus ubicaciones. Las densidades minerales óseas de las vértebras lumbares 1-4, del antebrazo distal bilateral, y del fémur proximal bilateral de los pacientes, fueron registradas y comparadas con las mediciones de la extremidad sin quemaduras. Resultados: No existieron correlaciones estadísticamente significativas entre el área total de la superficie corporal de las quemaduras, su severidad y las puntuaciones z. Además, al comparar las puntuaciones z de la extremidad quemada con las de la extremidad no quemada, no se encontró ninguna diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p > 0.05).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bone Loss During the Acute Stage Following Burn Injury: Is it Local Or Systemic?

Analan¹,

Leblebici²,

Adam³

et al. 2016

West Indian Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Next, a measurement scan is performed, and the data are collected. [25][26][27][28][29] The superior (T12) and inferior (L5) vertebrae were potted with screws and rigid polyurethane (80 shore-D hardness) in aluminum cups to allow 1 normal disc between the potted vertebra and the most cephalad (T13) and caudal (L4) fixation vertebrae.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Rod-Plate Anterior Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Scoliosis: Biomechanical Evaluation Compared With Dual-Rod and Single-Rod With Structural Interbody Support

Zhou

Johnston²,

Pierce

et al. 2006

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Birçok yanık hastası taburculuk sonrası kemik kırılması riski taşıması nedeniyle, yanık hastaları yeterli miktarda kalsiyum ve vitamin D almalıdır (10,59).…”

Section: Vitamin Antioksidan Ve Minerallerunclassified

Yanık Hastalarında Beslenme

Aydoğan¹,

Ekici²

2012

Tybbd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone Mineral Density Changes Following Burn Injury

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Bone Loss During the Acute Stage Following Burn Injury: Is it Local Or Systemic?

Bone Loss During the Acute Stage Following Burn Injury: Is it Local Or Systemic?

New Rod-Plate Anterior Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Scoliosis: Biomechanical Evaluation Compared With Dual-Rod and Single-Rod With Structural Interbody Support

Yanık Hastalarında Beslenme

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About