2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Versus Soft-Tissue Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gold standard treatment for ACL reconstruction is the use of autograft or allograft tissues . The surgical use of autograft has limitations including donor site morbidity, leading to the increasing use of allografts . Allografts are however associated with prolonged periods of incorporation due to the presence of cellular components .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gold standard treatment for ACL reconstruction is the use of autograft or allograft tissues . The surgical use of autograft has limitations including donor site morbidity, leading to the increasing use of allografts . Allografts are however associated with prolonged periods of incorporation due to the presence of cellular components .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The surgical use of autograft has limitations including donor site morbidity, 4 leading to the increasing use of allografts. 5 Allografts are however associated with prolonged periods of incorporation due to the presence of cellular components. 6 A promising alternative is the use of acellular allogeneic or xenogeneic tendon or ligament tissue for ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…showed that the overall stability rate was 72% for all autografts compared with 59% for all allografts ( P < 0.001), which did not account for the effect of irradiation on the allograft tissue. Christopher et al . and Mariscalco et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of allografts has increased in recent years because they offer less donor‐site morbidity, shorter surgical and anesthesia times, fewer postoperative complications, faster postoperative recovery, lower incidence of postoperative arthrofibrosis, less postoperative pain, and an unlimited graft source in the setting of multi‐ligament and revision reconstructions. However, allografts are associated with a higher expense, a risk of disease transmission, delayed healing, ligamentization, and an increased risk of graft rupture in the younger, more active population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the graft depends on different patient's and surgeon's factors [8]. However, it was found that patellar tendon (PT) autografts produce a more statically stable knee [3] and less failure rate and risk of early revision than hamstrings tendons (HT) [9] [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%