2009
DOI: 10.1097/id.0b013e3181bb840d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Quality: A Reality for the Process of Osseointegration

Abstract: This article subscribes to the initial condition of bone quality and its ultimate effect on the success of dental implant treatment. A high success rate for the preservation of the alveolar bone around oral implants is predicated on good bone quality. For implantologists, the classification of bone quality should be based on the key elements required for osseointegration. These include structural morphology and cellular characteristics such as monocytes/macrophages, mesenchymal progenitor cells, fibroblasts, o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Quantification of trabecular structure can be of value when determining the risk of osteoporotic bone 13,14 as well as in the stability of tooth implants. 15,16 There are, to our knowledge, only a few articles describing the possibility of using CBCT to image trabecular microarchitecture where these measurements have been verified using micro-CT (mCT), [17][18][19][20] which can be regarded as a gold standard. 21 The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate how different imaging settings in CBCT may affect the accuracy in quantifying trabecular bone structure by comparing the results to those of a gold standard, mCT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Quantification of trabecular structure can be of value when determining the risk of osteoporotic bone 13,14 as well as in the stability of tooth implants. 15,16 There are, to our knowledge, only a few articles describing the possibility of using CBCT to image trabecular microarchitecture where these measurements have been verified using micro-CT (mCT), [17][18][19][20] which can be regarded as a gold standard. 21 The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate how different imaging settings in CBCT may affect the accuracy in quantifying trabecular bone structure by comparing the results to those of a gold standard, mCT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the neovascularization goes together with new-formed bone formation (Raines et al, 2010;Santos and Reis, 2010) and clinically, this point is of particular interest to enhance the primary and longterm fixation of implants (Davies, 2003;Broos and Sermon, 2004;Sakka and Coulthard, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical bone helps to attain primary implant stability, but the role of cancellous bone is also remarkable. This is because cancellous bone has a higher bone turnover rate than cortical bone 5 and has direct contact with the majority of the implant surface. 6 Accordingly, it influences the healing and osseointegration process at the implantbone surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%