2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone segmentation on whole-body CT using convolutional neural network with novel data augmentation techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
62
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows that the combination of two types of data augmentation methods was more effective than single type or no data augmentation methods. Our results were consistent with the results of previous study done for bone segmentation with CNN 15 . Because the dataset of the current study was relatively small-sized (number of CXR images was 1248), it was necessary to improve the robustness of CNN models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Table 4 shows that the combination of two types of data augmentation methods was more effective than single type or no data augmentation methods. Our results were consistent with the results of previous study done for bone segmentation with CNN 15 . Because the dataset of the current study was relatively small-sized (number of CXR images was 1248), it was necessary to improve the robustness of CNN models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This method could make up for the lack of data for the training, validation and testing of a CNN model, as this involves a set of altered images different from the original ones. In the case of data enhancement, this could solve the issue of insufficient data and improve the accuracy of convolutional neural network training [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that, although statistical shape modelling workflows present the advantage of reconstructing bone geometries from sparse segmentations or even skin landmarks, bone models from medical image segmentation still provide the most accurate estimations of joint parameters; for example, median root-mean-squared errors up to 11.09 mm and larger than 13.8 mm (Nolte et al, 2020) have been reported in the identification of the centre of the femoral head using statistical shape models. Considering that radiological scans are routinely collected to plan musculoskeletal surgical interventions and that the time required to segment bones (Noguchi et al, 2020) has decreased by orders of magnitudes thanks to recent deep learning techniques, the generation of personalised lower limb models in a number of clinical applications appears technically feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%