Bottom up modeling of the connectome: Linking structure and function in the resting brain and their changes in aging

Abstract

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AbstractWith the increasing availability of advanced imaging technologies, we are entering a new era of neuroscience. Detailed descriptions of the complex brain network enable us to map out a structural connectome, characterize it with graph theoretical methods, and compare it to the functional networks with increasing detail. To link these two aspects and understand how dynamics and structure interact to form functional brain networks in task and in the resting state, we use theoretical models. The advantage of using theoretical models is that by recreating functional connectivity and time series explicitly from structure and pre-defined dynamics, we can extract critical mechanisms by linking structure and function in ways not directly accessible in the real brain. Recently, resting state models with varying local dynamics have reproduced empirical functional connectivity patterns, and given support to the view that the brain works at a critical point at the edge of a bifurcation of the system. Here, we present an overview of a modeling approach of the resting brain network and give an application of a neural mass model in the study of complexity changes in aging.-----

Entropy of Entropy: Measurement of Dynamical Complexity for Biological Systems

“…MSE has been widely applied in analyzing many physiologic signals, such as heart rate [2,3,24], electroencephalography (EEG) signal [25][26][27], blood oxygen level-dependent signals in functional magnetic resonance imaging [28], diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the brain [29], neuronal spiking [30], center of pressure signals in balance [31,32] and intracranial pressure signal [33].…”

Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain

“…These units govern the local temporal dynamics of the network nodes (Honey et al, 2007;Ghosh et al, 2008a;Deco et al, 2009). The spatial extent of this subunit is abstract and it can range from a micro-column [submillimetric, millimetric resolution] Steyn-Ross et al, 1999;Liley et al, 2002;Bojak and Liley, 2005;Liley and Bojak, 2005;Foster et al, 2008;Spiegler and Jirsa, 2013;Liley and Walsh, 2013) to a whole cortical area (Ghosh et al, 2008a;Deco et al, 2009;Knock et al, 2009;Victor et al, 2011;Nakagawa et al, 2013;Deco et al, 2013;Honey et al, 2007Honey et al, , 2009Cabral et al, 2012). The connectivity architecture (and hierarchy) of a spatially embedded cortical network depends on both the scale of the mesoscopic model and the resolution of the spatial support.…”

Revolution of Alzheimer Precision Neurology. Passageway of Systems Biology and Neurophysiology

“…Human structural networks capture individual differences that relate to genetics [233] and various phenotypic variables, including indices of cognitive performance [234]. They also exhibit characteristic changes across the life span [120], during normal aging [235] and in the course of brain disorders [236]. For example, the loss of connectivity associated with the progression of AD results a loss of links between dense clusters of functionally-related regions and hence a decreased capacity for integration [237, 238].…”