2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1901.08043
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up Object Detection by Grouping Extreme and Center Points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Duan et al, 2019), an extension of CornerNet is proposed by adding the center of the bounding box as keypoint. In (Zhou et al, 2019b), ExtremeNet is presented where keypoints are given by objects' extreme point. Extreme points have the advantage over corners of being always part of the object, without being affecting by background information.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Duan et al, 2019), an extension of CornerNet is proposed by adding the center of the bounding box as keypoint. In (Zhou et al, 2019b), ExtremeNet is presented where keypoints are given by objects' extreme point. Extreme points have the advantage over corners of being always part of the object, without being affecting by background information.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grouping method of ExtremeNet [26] is to match 4 extreme points with the center point, and basic rules are based on the assumption that if geometric center points of 4 extreme points match the predicted center points then the same object should they belong to. However, this method is still unable to be applied to detect aircraft due to the fact that many of them may be spatially symmetric in remote sensing images.…”
Section: Bottom-up Detectors Based On Dcnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-stage detectors YOLO9000 [17] DarkNet-19 544×544 82.4% 81.4% 81.9% YOLOv3 [18] DarkNet-53 608×608 85.4% 85.5% 85.4% SSD [14] ResNet-101 513×513 88.7% 89.4% 89.0% RetinaNet [15] ResNet-101 512×512 89.8% 90.9% 90.3% ConerNet(S) [16] 104-Hourglass 511×511 76.2% 77.4% 76.8% ConerNet(M) [16] 104-Hourglass 511×511 76.8% 77.4% 77.1% ExtremeNet [26] 104 4.4.4. Error analysis X-LineNet has three forms of detection results.…”
Section: Comparison On Different Train Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…˜100k ), which may result in easy negatives dominated training. Most recently, anchor-free detectors [16,17,18,19,20,21] gain much attention due to their simplicity, but they are driven by key-point detection (e.g. the center point), thus still suffering from the similar imbalance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focal Loss [13] and GHM [22]. Similarly, anchor-free detectors [17,18,20,21] apply Focal Loss or its variants for key-point prediction. Despite being effective, these schemes are usually heuristic and demand laborious hyper-parameters tuning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%