2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Botulinum toxin infiltrations versus local anaesthetic infiltrations in pelvic floor myofascial pain: Multicentre, randomized, double-blind study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can therefore be assumed that the pain reduction after BoNT/A infiltration was in general clinically important. The PGI-I results outperformed those reported in other studies, in which not all the patients described a subjective improvement associated with BoNT/A [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can therefore be assumed that the pain reduction after BoNT/A infiltration was in general clinically important. The PGI-I results outperformed those reported in other studies, in which not all the patients described a subjective improvement associated with BoNT/A [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…According to numerous published studies [10], BoNT/A infiltration may significantly relieve pain and improve quality of life, according to outcomes assessed by clinical questionnaires. However, the response to treatment is highly variable among patients; while some women report a substantial reduction in painful symptoms after BoNT/A infiltration, others do not perceive any improvement of their clinical condition [11,12] or even report a worsening of it [13]. The inability to know in advance whether the patient is a potential responder to botulinum toxin, as well as the absence of a significant improvement of CPP symptoms after treatment, can be frustrating for both the patient and the physician.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of BTX-A combined with 0.2% local anaesthetic ropivacaine hydrochloride injection (BTX group) with ropivacaine hydrochloride injection alone (LA group) for the treatment of pelvic floor myofascial syndrome and chronic pelvic pain showing that neither group exhibited any significant differences on day 60. However, the two groups showed an overall improvement in pain, meaning that intramuscular injection with ropivacaine hydrochloride alone was justified (Gorimanipalli et al, 2019;Levesque et al, 2021). The randomized clinical trials of BTX-A for myofascial pain has also been elaborated (Table 1).…”
Section: Myofascial Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Levesque et al, 2021) epicondylitis, suggesting the location of injection as a potential source of outcome heterogeneity (Song et al, 2020).…”
Section: P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 , 7 However, the efficacy and rationale remain controversial. 8 Therefore, the identification of other mechanisms of MTrPs is crucial for the development of novel effective therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%