2014
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2014.120778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded gain-scheduled LQR satellite control using a tilted wheel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For years, various guidance laws have been utilized with different control concepts. Currently, most popular terminal guidance laws defined by Locke involve line-of-sight (LOS) guidance [6], [7], LOS rate guidance [8], [9], commandto-line-of-sight (CLOS) guidance [10], [11], and other advanced guidances such as proportional navigation guidance (PNG) [12]- [14], command to optimal interception point (COIP) guidance [15], augmented proportional navigation guidance (APNG) [16], optimal guidance law [17]- [19], linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) theory [20], [21], sliding mode theory [22], H ∞ robust theory, impact angle control [23]- [25] and fuzzy logic control theory [26]- [28], etc. For the above conventional guidance strategy designs, it assumed the information of target and missile can be obtained perfectly by the seeker of missile for guidance control design, namely it neglect the effect of measurement noise in seeker.…”
Section: Introdutctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For years, various guidance laws have been utilized with different control concepts. Currently, most popular terminal guidance laws defined by Locke involve line-of-sight (LOS) guidance [6], [7], LOS rate guidance [8], [9], commandto-line-of-sight (CLOS) guidance [10], [11], and other advanced guidances such as proportional navigation guidance (PNG) [12]- [14], command to optimal interception point (COIP) guidance [15], augmented proportional navigation guidance (APNG) [16], optimal guidance law [17]- [19], linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) theory [20], [21], sliding mode theory [22], H ∞ robust theory, impact angle control [23]- [25] and fuzzy logic control theory [26]- [28], etc. For the above conventional guidance strategy designs, it assumed the information of target and missile can be obtained perfectly by the seeker of missile for guidance control design, namely it neglect the effect of measurement noise in seeker.…”
Section: Introdutctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst different actuators, the reaction wheels are acknowledged for their proven performance, relative simplicity, fast response and high pointing control accuracy. Regardless of the actuators type, various control approaches have been proposed for satellite attitude stability and tracking problem including optimal approach [10,11], adaptive control [12,13], robust control [14,15], Lyapunov-based methods [9,16,17], observer-based approaches [18,19], fuzzy control [20,21], and sliding mode control [22][23][24]. Among all mentioned methods, the sliding mode control (SMC) approach is acknowledged for its ability to cope with the uncertainties and disturbances in the nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst different actuators, the reaction wheels are acknowledged for their proven performance, relative simplicity, fast response and high pointing control accuracy. Regardless of the actuators type, various control approaches have been proposed for satellite attitude stability and tracking problem including optimal approach , adaptive control , robust control , Lyapunov‐based methods , observer‐based approaches , fuzzy control , and sliding mode control .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, linear quadratic regulator (LQR) is one of the well-known and powerful methods in the design of optimal controllers which ensures a satisfactory robustness 9 and has shown good capabilities in a wide variety of applications. 10–14 Besides guaranteed Gain Margin (GM) and Phase Margin (PM), LQR also provides the designer the ability to manage the amount of error and control effort via state and control weighting matrices available in the cost function. 15 These two matrices in fact govern the feedback gain matrix and the designer can tune them to modify the system eigenstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%