2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0737-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bowel perforation by a peritoneal dialysis catheter: report of two cases

Abstract: BackgroundComplications of peritoneal dialysis (PD) such as pain and catheter leakage are frequently reported. Delayed bowel perforation of a PD catheter is a rare adverse event but a serious complication associated with significant mortality. Bowel perforation of a PD catheter is difficult to differentiate from PD-related peritonitis and likely to result in a delay in diagnosis. Here, we report two cases of bowel perforation after PD catheter insertion by the stepwise initiation of PD using the Moncrief and P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a rare case of delayed intestinal perforation by PD catheter. Although many cases of intestinal perforation by the tip of the PD catheter have been reported, a fistula between a side hole of the PD catheter and intestine has not been reported . A long implantation duration (9 months) of the PD catheter in the peritoneal cavity without PD solution may have contributed to the development of this complication in the present case, similar to previously reported cases .…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is a rare case of delayed intestinal perforation by PD catheter. Although many cases of intestinal perforation by the tip of the PD catheter have been reported, a fistula between a side hole of the PD catheter and intestine has not been reported . A long implantation duration (9 months) of the PD catheter in the peritoneal cavity without PD solution may have contributed to the development of this complication in the present case, similar to previously reported cases .…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Symptoms of perforation of the small intestine or bladder after blind catheter insertion may remain silent for some time after surgery and may be associated with good initial catheter function, making the diagnosis more elusive. Surgical repair of the perforation site and intravenous antibiotic therapy are mandatory (6).…”
Section: Perforationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed the relevant literature on PubMed for secondary peritonitis in PD patients since 2017 (Table 1). [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Out of the 16 cases, perforation was the most common cause of secondary peritonitis, which might be easier to diagnose due to changes in dialysate properties. Two cases were complicated with abscesses in the kidney 8 and the spleen, as shown in our case, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%