2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70093-9_90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Effective Connectivity Analysis from EEG for Positive and Negative Emotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average CC, Le, and Ge values in the high gamma band for the positive and the negative stimuli were higher than those for the neutral stimuli, whereas the average CPL value for the positive and the negative stimuli was smaller than that for the neutral stimuli. These results further demonstrate that the BNs of the positive and the negative stimuli were more efficient than those for the neutral stimulus (Zhang et al, 2017). Furthermore, the CC, Le, and Ge values for the negative pictures were higher (p < 0.01) than those for the positive picture; the negative pictures had a smaller (p < 0.01) CPL value than the positive pictures.…”
Section: Relationships Between Bn Properties and Emotion Arousalsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average CC, Le, and Ge values in the high gamma band for the positive and the negative stimuli were higher than those for the neutral stimuli, whereas the average CPL value for the positive and the negative stimuli was smaller than that for the neutral stimuli. These results further demonstrate that the BNs of the positive and the negative stimuli were more efficient than those for the neutral stimulus (Zhang et al, 2017). Furthermore, the CC, Le, and Ge values for the negative pictures were higher (p < 0.01) than those for the positive picture; the negative pictures had a smaller (p < 0.01) CPL value than the positive pictures.…”
Section: Relationships Between Bn Properties and Emotion Arousalsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…These results further demonstrate that the high gamma components in EEG are associated with emotion processing. Differences exist in the DE distribution in multiple brain regions, which also demonstrates that emotional activity requires the cooperation of multiple related brain regions (Bassett and Bullmore, 2006;Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Neural Signature Of Emotional States In the High Gamma Bandmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alipour et al [27] found that alpha connectivity of the fronto-central connections was primarily associated with emotional music, especially in valence. In Zhang et al [41], significant differences in effective connectivity were found between positive and negative emotions. Specifically, frontal regions and connectivity with other regions play a critical role in emotion processing.…”
Section: A Emotion In Response To Auditory Stimulimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed QTFD-based features in recognizing different emotion classes, we have developed three performance evaluation analyses: Channel-based analysis: In this analysis, we investigate the effect of utilizing various groups of EEG channels, which cover different regions of the brain, on the accuracy of recognizing the emotion classes defined based on the four emotion labeling schemes. Recently, several studies have indicated that the frontal, prefrontal, temporal, parietal and occipital regions of the brain are involved in emotional responses [ 25 , 32 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. In particular, Mohammadi et al [ 58 ] utilized five pairs of electrodes that cover the frontal and frontal parietal regions of the brain, where these pairs are F3-F4, F7-F8, FC1-FC2, FC5-FC6 and FP1-FP2, to recognize emotional states defined based on the 2D arousal-valence plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%