1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91194-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast-Feeding and Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Breast-feeding has in some studies been shown to have a protective role in development in Type 1 diabetes [12,13] while other studies have failed to confirm this result [14,15]. A previous study [16] based on the same material as in this study, did not show any significant difference in the duration of exclusive breastfeeding between diabetic patients and control children apart from differences in some subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Breast-feeding has in some studies been shown to have a protective role in development in Type 1 diabetes [12,13] while other studies have failed to confirm this result [14,15]. A previous study [16] based on the same material as in this study, did not show any significant difference in the duration of exclusive breastfeeding between diabetic patients and control children apart from differences in some subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Although this observation was not confirmed by three subsequent studies [87][88][89], two additional studies published in 1988, one from Australia [90] and the other from the United States (Colorado) [91], support the original report [86]. An association between extent and duration of breast-feeding and lower incidence of IDDM was subsequently reported in other studies from Sweden [92], Finland [93], Hungary [94], and the United States [95].…”
Section: Breast-feeding and Incidence Of Iddmmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The cow's milk hypothesis was further supported by both animal studies and immunological studies in humans [22]. However, several analytical epidemiological studies, did not confirm these associations [23][24][25][26][27], and the evidence hence cannot be regarded as fully conclusive. Two meta-analyses led to inconsistent results, either concluding that there is evidence for a weak causal relation [17], or attributing the observed weak associations to methodical shortcomings of studies [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%