1985
DOI: 10.1079/bjn19850055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast-milk production and energy exchange in human lactation

Abstract: I . The milk production of one mother was determined post-partum for a period of 13 weeks, during which time breast milk was her infant's only source of food energy. The weight changes of both the mother and the male infant were recorded during this period.2. The food intake and activity pattern of the mother were also recorded for 4-week periods: at 2, 6, 10 weeks after birth and 2 weeks after the cessation of lactation, which was maintained for a period of 27 weeks.3. The infant regained his birth weight of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This compares with a cost per individual pup of 202 kJ d Ϫ1 calculated for a lactating mother. Therefore, an average of 10 helpers would potentially enable a typical breeding female to reduce her own DEE, whilst maintaining maximal MEI, and thereby support one extra pup (assuming a milk production efficiency of 85% (Commonwealth Agricultural Council 1980;English 1985)), resulting in a litter size of four; a 25% fitness bene-fit to the breeding female. It is important to bear in mind that these values were recorded for groups in the absence of allo-lactators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This compares with a cost per individual pup of 202 kJ d Ϫ1 calculated for a lactating mother. Therefore, an average of 10 helpers would potentially enable a typical breeding female to reduce her own DEE, whilst maintaining maximal MEI, and thereby support one extra pup (assuming a milk production efficiency of 85% (Commonwealth Agricultural Council 1980;English 1985)), resulting in a litter size of four; a 25% fitness bene-fit to the breeding female. It is important to bear in mind that these values were recorded for groups in the absence of allo-lactators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the study period, allolactating females decreased in mass, while the other categories of animals (dominant lactating females and nonlactating subordinate females) did not. This mass loss was equivalent to an energy deficit of 264 kJ d Ϫ1 , or 35 g milk d Ϫ1 (assuming an efficiency of milk production from body reserves of 0.85 (Commonwealth Agricultural Council 1980;English 1985)), which is potentially enough resources to support at least one extra pup per allolactator. Bearing in mind that babysitting and personal foraging are mutually exclusive activities (Clutton-Brock et al 1998), one possible explanation as to why allolactators lost weight during the week of peak lactation is that they may have babysat more than other categories of females did.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%