2004
DOI: 10.1650/7634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding Dispersal and Philopatry in the Tree Swallow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study colonies Site fidelity of this species males was not reduced significantly by poor nest success in a previous year (Murphy 1996). In the case of other animal species however, a lack of reproductive success may increase the dispersion of individuals within a population (Haas 1998, Grosbois et al 2003, Winkler et al 2004, Fowler 2005. Fowler (2005) showed that breeding success and extent of kinship with the nearest neighbour had a positive effect on breeding philopatry, and consequently on fine-scale spatial and genetic structuring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study colonies Site fidelity of this species males was not reduced significantly by poor nest success in a previous year (Murphy 1996). In the case of other animal species however, a lack of reproductive success may increase the dispersion of individuals within a population (Haas 1998, Grosbois et al 2003, Winkler et al 2004, Fowler 2005. Fowler (2005) showed that breeding success and extent of kinship with the nearest neighbour had a positive effect on breeding philopatry, and consequently on fine-scale spatial and genetic structuring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Hetmański Aars & Ims 2000), and a lack of reproductive success (Haas 1998, Grosbois et al 2003, Winkler et al 2004, Fowler 2005. Sensitivity and/or unresponsiveness to these variables may vary according to age and sex, which leads to dispersion asymmetry within a given population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that birds change nest sites after a breeding failure, and tend to return to those where their young were raised successfully (e.g. Gowaty & Plissner 1997, Winkler et al 2004. A preference for a site with the nest from a first breeding attempt of the season especially could be explained by nest site fidelity (Gowaty & Plissner 1997, Stanback & Dervan 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances it is likely that dispersal is easier between coastal habitats. In addition, females in many bird species are more likely to disperse following a failed nesting attempt (Gowaty and Plissner 1997;Greenwood and Harvey 1982;Haas 1998;Powell and Frasch 2000;Winkler et al 2004), and nest failure rates are higher in the coastal population. However, breeding males are likely much more site-faithful, and the fact that our data do not indicate higher return rates among coastal males suggests that survival rates are not substantially higher on the coast than inland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%