1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00136074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging defects resistance in the metal layer of a CMOS process

Abstract: The resistance value of bridging defects in CMOS VLSI circuits are evaluated through a set of measurements performed on process-related defect monitoring wafers. The monitor circuits considered are made of metall lines. The results show how the vast majority of the measured metall to metall bridges has a low resistance. Only a small percentage of the overall bridges resulted in a resistance value above 500 f2, while the exact percentage can vary from batch to batch. This high resistance does not seem to be the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider single resistive non-feedback BFs whose resistance (Ê) can be varied in a wide range [7] inside simple circuits because, in the considered case, the effects of parameters fluctuations are mainly local (this does not hold for faster test rates), regarding the electrical behavior of the directly involved gates and a few levels of gates in their transitive fan-out. The considered circuits are, then, representative of subcircuits embedded in larger combinational blocks.…”
Section: ¾ « ø× ó ô ö ñ ø ö ù øù ø óò×mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider single resistive non-feedback BFs whose resistance (Ê) can be varied in a wide range [7] inside simple circuits because, in the considered case, the effects of parameters fluctuations are mainly local (this does not hold for faster test rates), regarding the electrical behavior of the directly involved gates and a few levels of gates in their transitive fan-out. The considered circuits are, then, representative of subcircuits embedded in larger combinational blocks.…”
Section: ¾ « ø× ó ô ö ñ ø ö ù øù ø óò×mentioning
confidence: 99%