22nd IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault-Tolerance in VLSI Systems (DFT 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/dft.2007.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Quality Test Vectors for Bridging Faults in the Presence of IC's Parameters Variations

Abstract: The growing dispersion of parameters in CMOS ICs poses relevant uncertainties on gate output\ud conductances and logic thresholds that affect bridging fault (BF) detection. To analyze the quality\ud of fault simulation and test generation tools using nominal IC parameters, we studied BF detection\ud as a function of the standard deviation of parameters: results show that a single test vector cannot\ud ensure acceptable escape probabilities. Conversely, the minimal number of test vectors providing\ud null escap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In testing for static defects, process variation has been considered in testing analog devices [154], and testing for bridges in static CMOS designs [99,155]. Testing analog devices under process variation means that the stimuli used for nominal values of IC parameters are not necessarily effective for all configurations of IC parameters as they occur due to variation.…”
Section: Logic Testing Under Process Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In testing for static defects, process variation has been considered in testing analog devices [154], and testing for bridges in static CMOS designs [99,155]. Testing analog devices under process variation means that the stimuli used for nominal values of IC parameters are not necessarily effective for all configurations of IC parameters as they occur due to variation.…”
Section: Logic Testing Under Process Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of a target delay fault by a single test vector pair occurs with a certain delay fault detection probability, which must be increased by the application of additional test vector pairs to minimize the risk of test escapes [6]. This probability depends on many delay test parameters [7]- [13], which must be optimized to find a suitable compromise between the final delay test quality and the test cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two experiments were performed. In the first experiment (Table III columns [8][9][10][11][12][13] we kept the original test set of each circuit and augmented it with additional test patterns to reduce test escapes for three weighted average test robustness targets (W A target 0.96, 0.98 and 0.995). Columns marked "WA" show the weighted average robustness of the test sets, evaluated with other PVCs than those that were used in test generation.…”
Section: B Test Quality Gain Through Process Variation-aware Atpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that test sets generated without consideration of process variation are compromised in terms of test quality in the presence of process variation. To regain the lost test quality, additional test patterns can be generated (Table III column [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Alternatively, high test quality in the presence of process variation can be obtained by generating a new test set (Table III column [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: B Test Quality Gain Through Process Variation-aware Atpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation